XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.curre   
   t-events.wtc.bush-knew   
   From: Phatty@Boombatty.com   
      
   On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:13:56 GMT, Vandar  wrote:   
      
   >Phatty Boombatty wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:37:25 GMT, Vandar  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>Phatty Boombatty wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>All this discussion and re-hashing has (successfully) steered the   
   >>>>conversation away from the point:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>BBC and CNN both reported prematurely on 9/11 that building 7 had   
   >>>>collapsed. Just because they "expected" or "thought" it might collapse   
   >>>>didn't mean that it was inevitable.   
   >>>   
   >>>They didnt say it was inevitable.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> If it wasn't inevitable, why would the story have gone out on the   
   >> wire? Hmm... maybe it was planned?   
   >   
   >Because humans make mistakes.   
   >   
   >>>>And, argue as you might, any rational person can look at the fall of   
   >>>>building 7 and surmise that, regardless of even "heavy damage" to a   
   >>>>portion of the building, the crimp in the center and then symmetrical   
   >>>>collapse hardly seems the likely result of said damage. It would have   
   >>>>required all structural integrity to fail simultaneously, ie.,   
   >>>>controlled demolition.   
   >>>   
   >>>Those with relevant expertise disagree.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>One of you (can't remember which, you're all starting to sound the   
   >>>>same) recently even pointed to the heavy damage of building 6. Why   
   >>>>didn't they announce that building 6 had fallen?   
   >>>   
   >>>Because it didn't fall.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Exactly. And neither had 7.   
   >   
   >Yes it did. Six never fell.   
      
   You're failing to see the point, either intentionally or otherwise.   
   BOTH 6 and 7 had sustained heavy damage, yet when it was PREMATURELY   
   reported that 7 had collapsed, they might just have easily reported   
   that 6 had. At that point, neither one had fallen, but 30 minutes   
   prior to the collapse, they reported that 7 had. No "bad reporting"   
   that 6 had collapsed, just 7, since that was in the plan. It ain't   
   rocket science, bro.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)