XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.curre   
   t-events.wtc.bush-knew   
      
   On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 02:49:25 GMT, Vandar  wrote:   
      
      
   >>>Exactly. And neither had 7.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> I have to take issue with Vandar.  There is a very large crater that   
   >> covers most of what was WTC6, visible in aerial photographs.  Enough   
   >> of WTC6 collapsed that the demolition companies used cables to pull   
   >> down what was remaining.   
   >   
   >I concur with your statement. What I'm implying is that building six   
   >didn't collapse as an intact structure. It was effectively destroyed in   
   >the collapses and the remainder of it was intentionally brought down   
   >during the clean up.   
      
   Which is what I said originally.  It didn't collapse 6+ hours after   
   the fact like WTC7 did.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)