XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.curre   
   t-events.wtc.bush-knew   
   From: Phatty@Boombatty.com   
      
   On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:42:15 -0500, Animal05   
    wrote:   
      
   >Phatty Boombatty wrote:   
   >   
   >> All this discussion and re-hashing has (successfully) steered the   
   >> conversation away from the point:   
   >>   
   >> BBC and CNN both reported prematurely on 9/11 that building 7 had   
   >> collapsed. Just because they "expected" or "thought" it might collapse   
   >> didn't mean that it was inevitable.   
   >>   
   >> And, argue as you might, any rational person can look at the fall of   
   >> building 7 and surmise that, regardless of even "heavy damage" to a   
   >> portion of the building, the crimp in the center and then symmetrical   
   >> collapse   
   >   
   >It wasn't a symmetrical collaspe.   
      
   Obviously you have not seen the videos.   
      
   >   
   >>hardly seems the likely result of said damage.   
   >   
   >ONly if you have no knowledge of building structures   
   >   
   >>It would have   
   >> required all structural integrity to fail simultaneously, ie.,   
   >> controlled demolition.   
   >   
   >LMAO........nope   
   >   
   >>   
   >> One of you (can't remember which, you're all starting to sound the   
   >> same) recently even pointed to the heavy damage of building 6. Why   
   >> didn't they announce that building 6 had fallen?   
   >   
   >Different structural system, different damage.   
   >   
   >>It had sustained   
   >> heavy damage from debris as well, right? But they knew 6 wasn't going   
   >> to fall, because it wasn't part of the script (which BBC & CNN just   
   >> happened to read a little prematurely).   
   >   
   >Your logic would conclude that driving a yugo and a sem truck into a   
   >block wall would result in the same damage.   
      
   Hardly. You're creating a straw man that is completely unrelated.   
      
   >   
   >>   
   >> Nitpick and sidetrack all you want, but the obvious facts remain   
   >> obvious.   
   >   
   >To konspiracy kooks.   
      
   Expected response.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)