home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.america-at-war      Debating how war is good for business      4,706 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,503 of 4,706   
   John P. to Phatty Boombatty   
   Re: CNN Also Prematurely Reported WTC7 C   
   03 Mar 07 01:01:13   
   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.curre   
   t-events.wtc.bush-knew   
   From: AdmiralPee@neveragainvolunteeryourself.com   
      
   "Phatty Boombatty"  wrote in a message   
      
   > You're failing to see the point, either intentionally or otherwise.   
   > BOTH 6 and 7 had sustained heavy damage, yet when it was PREMATURELY   
   > reported that 7 had collapsed, they might just have easily reported   
   > that 6 had. At that point, neither one had fallen, but 30 minutes   
   > prior to the collapse, they reported that 7 had. No "bad reporting"   
   > that 6 had collapsed, just 7, since that was in the plan. It ain't   
   > rocket science, bro.   
      
   You're failing to grasp that after six was crushed under the tower, the   
   remaining structure did not show signs of probable collapse, whereas after   
   seven was crushed under the tower, the remaining structure *did* show signs   
   of probable collapse for several hours. Had you bothered to research this   
   not so insignificant fact, you might be able to grasp that there would be   
   reports that seven appeared likely to collapse, while no such reports would   
   have been given for other buildings - *because they didn't appear as though   
   they were likely to collapse."   
      
   Getting from a report that seven appeared likely to collapse to two   
   erroneous reports .out of hundreds (or maybe thousands) is not quite so   
   amazing leap given the track record of reporters.   
      
   Try playing your fantasy out. The US government decides to murder thousands   
   of Americans. They come up with a plan, and provide scripts for this plan to   
   thousands of news organizations around the globe. The news organizations   
   then do what? Simply agree to read the script? That's how this works for   
   you? And you can say that with a straight face?   
      
   I have to say, every time I read one of your posts, I'm always waiting for   
   the punch line... but, you're serious, aren't you? Somehow this partial   
   theory works for you?   
      
   Amazing.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca