XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.curre   
   t-events.wtc.bush-knew   
      
   On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 21:56:28 -0600, "Pat"   
    wrote:   
      
      
      
   >| Yet you (and they) do so in the face of overwhelming evidence to the   
   >| contrary.  And you (and the rest of the conspiracy wacko crowd) cannot   
   >| produce the first piece of hard evidence to support your beliefs.  If   
   >| that's not an example of faith, one has to wonder what would qualify.   
   >   
   >I haven't seen any of this "overwhelming evidence to the contrary".   
      
   Then you haven't really looked for it very hard.  I'll give you a   
   hint.  It won't be found on conspiracy wacko web pages.   
      
   >And I am   
   >not part of any crowd. Never have been, either.   
      
   Sure, sure.   
      
   >Evidence of motive is important in any criminal investigation. The truth   
   >about the unsavory connections of the Bush family must be considered in the   
   >light of all the rest. I don't live anywhere near the National Archives nor   
   >am I able to travel there. Maybe you can make the trip and see the documents   
   >uncovered by John Buchanan for yourself instead of insisting that someone   
   >"produce" them for you   
      
   And any research into a supposed "Bush-Nazi" connection has nothing to   
   do with 9/11.   
      
   Now, would you like to produce some evidence related to 9/11?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)