XPost: alt.conspiracy
From: dearhunter@home.net
"John P." wrote in
news:YLGdnfg7opXgAnbYnZ2dnUVZ_smonZ2d@comcast.com:
> "dearhunter" wrote in a message
>
>> What industry knowledge? It's commom sense, (DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT
>> WORD) that most like yourself simply do not have, don't you have
>> eyes?
>
>> Do you have to be a mechanic to say my car won't start?
>
> No. But you need to have some knowledge of how it works to know *why*
> it won't start.
>
>> Do you have to be a bodyman to say my car just got hit?
>
> No. But you need to have some knowledge to determine whether it is
> totalled or repairable. If the latter, you need to have some knowledge
> to know what is damaged, what can be repaired, what needs to be
> replaced.
>
>> Do you have to be an electrician to say I have no power?
>
> No. But you have to have some knowledge to know why you don't have
> power.
>
>> So why do I have to have industry knowledge to watch a
>> building fall perfectly?
>
> You don't, until you start attempting to explain *why* it fell.
>
> Without experience, you can watch the building fall and then be
> capable of saying "The building collapsed". Whether the gravity driven
> collapse was initiated by a controlled demolition or a structural
> failure due to fires and damage, it would appear the same. Simply
> watching a video of the building falling down does not provide
> sufficient information to say you can explain *why* it fell down based
> simply on common sense.
>
> If the video had contained the obvious series of explosions seen in
> controlled demolition videos, perhaps then you would be in a position
> to make that claim.
>
>> ...and GOD forbid a guy like me thinks your good "ole" usa
>> could be corrupt, not my country you say!
>
> You're stoned if you think anyone who believes the facts and evidence
> of 9/11 thinks the government isn't corrupt. I doubt there are more
> than a figurative handful of AMericans whop think government and
> politicians aren't corrupt.
>
> Your confusion seems to stem, in part, in thinking the existence of
> corruption is 'evidence' of complicity in 9/11.
>
> Hell, if the fact that politicians are corrupt were evidence of their
> complicity in crimes, they would be involved in every single crime
> committed in the country.
>
>> Oh, by the way, although I never built a 50 story building, I did
>> build cars, houses, maintenance supervisor for 30 years, but none of
>> this has anything to do with the fact that steel and concrete simply
>> does not burn,...
>
> An interesting statement. Wrong, but interesting. Iron burns.
>
>
>> and buildings do not collapse because of fire, try doing some
>> homework!
>
> That's a dumb statement. Buildings collapse from fires regularly. Even
> steel structured buildings collapse due to fires. Some collapse due to
> fires that are not even significantly large.
>
> Taking your own advice, your homework assignment is to explain why
> McCormick Place, the Sight and Sound Theater and the steel structure
> of the Madrid Tower collapsed to the 17th floor. For bonus points,
> explain why the Madrid Tower collapse stopped at that floor.
>
>
>
John, please don't be that stupid, the McCormick Place was a convention
center, long span, roof caved in, no big deal, go here, see for yourself:
http://www.chipublib.org/004chicago/disasters/mccormick_fire.html
Walls are/were still standing, big deal, the roof caved in. Surely you
can do better than this? Give me 3 buildings of solid concret and steel
other than the WTC then we can talk!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
