XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.consp   
   racy.antichrist   
   XPost: alt.illuminati   
      
   On 6 Apr 2007 13:55:13 -0700, "AirRaid"  wrote:   
      
   >On Apr 5, 10:03 pm, agen...@justicespammail.com wrote:   
   >> On 5 Apr 2007 19:07:43 -0700, "Air Raid"  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >On Apr 5, 6:20 pm, agen...@justicespammail.com wrote:   
   >> >> On 4 Apr 2007 19:12:44 -0700, "AirRaid"  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >> >very interesting stuff   
   >>   
   >> >> It is if you're a conspiracy wacko.   
   >>   
   >> >the official government-media story is itself a wacko conspiracy   
   >> >theory,   
   >> >youidiotic sheep.   
   >>   
   >> Then why do you have so much difficulty in providing any evidence that   
   >> proves it wrong?   
   >   
   >the evidence is all over the place, it's EVERYWHERE. look around   
   >fucktard.   
      
   99.999% of such "evidence" is supposition, assertion, error-ridden,   
   and outright lies.   
      
   Generally, it's offered up by people out to make a buck off the   
   conspiracy loons.   
      
   So let's repeat.  If it's "all over the place", why do youi have so   
   much difficulty in providing any evidence that proves the "official   
   government-media story" wrong?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)