XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order   
   From: dchainsRUS@dc.net   
      
    wrote in message   
   news:85u4231okmnqjt1o4foiv900jlf0fbk4tc@4ax.com...   
   > On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 10:00:52 -0400, "Dogchain"    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >> wrote in message   
   >>news:t173239ainu020i59o0ab08a9bcvo6iuh7@4ax.com...   
   >>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 20:06:16 -0400, "Dogchain"    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> wrote in message   
   >>>>news:k31b1359245kkdfm30o8krkhk6iv727kct@4ax.com...   
   >>>>> On 5 Apr 2007 02:23:13 -0700, "Day Brown"  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>More to the point is that the group think about 911 is breaking down.   
   >>>>>>I really would like to see the evidence, but the only place to present   
   >>>>>>*evidence* is in a legal proceeding where the witnesses have to   
   >>>>>>present their credentials to prove they are who they say, and swear   
   >>>>>>under oath and penalty of perjury.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Anyone can post anything on the net and claim to be whatever they   
   >>>>>>think will improve their credibility. The problem with not having a   
   >>>>>>court or congressional hearing is that these posted reports are   
   >>>>>>gradually increasing and damaging the credibility of those in   
   >>>>>>government, both Republicans and Democrats.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>I dont claim to know what happened on 911. In fact, I claim *NOT* to   
   >>>>>>know, and I'd like to get this issue settled so we can quit wasting   
   >>>>>>space on ad hominum and move on to some of the other issues that need   
   >>>>>>to be dealt with.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>If Col Razer has a case, then surely he can find some citizen of New   
   >>>>>>York city who suffered damages on 911 to bring a civil case against   
   >>>>>>Silverstein. With all the 911 websites, why havnt any of them already   
   >>>>>>done this to prove they are right? Didnt Silverstein receive billions?   
   >>>>>>Isnt there *money* to be made by smart lawyers? Arent there any smart   
   >>>>>>lawyers in New York city? If the 911 websites are correct, then isnt   
   >>>>>>there the *EVIDENCE* to present in a class action civil suit?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Hello? Why are we talking about this here, when there are millions to   
   >>>>>>be made by smart lawyers in New York? WTF?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Because the "smart lawyers" know that there isn't a case.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Or perhaps looking at the law...getting the ducks in a row.   
   >>>   
   >>> Or not.   
   >>   
   >>Because out here on Usenet you, wussyboi, are a structural engineer, tax   
   >>lawyer, civil attorney with Krekin-like abilities. bwahahahahah   
   >   
   > Maybe you should point out where I've ever claimed   
      
      
   Wussyboi doesn't need to claim he is to play one.   
      
   any of the above,   
   > coward.  But then you're just a cowardly liar.   
      
      
      
   The wussyboi calls me a coward after not wanting to follow through with his   
   Usenet bravery. A real knee slapper.   
      
      
      
      
      
      
   >   
   >>>>I've already said anytime (@ your convenience) ...just let me know.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Isn't that right, wussyboi?   
   >>>   
   >>> Name a date and time, coward.   
   >>   
   >>What part of the original conversation "anytime (@ your convenience)   
   >>...just   
   >>let me know" don't you wanna understand, wussyboi?   
      
      
   >   
   > You're the one who said:   
      
   I know what I stated, wussyboi. What part of the original conversation   
   "anytime (@ your convenience) ...just let me know" don't you wanna   
   understand, wussyboi?   
      
   Bwahahah.   
      
      
    The coward is still hiding.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)