home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.america-at-war      Debating how war is good for business      4,706 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,667 of 4,706   
   agent86@justicespammail.com to All   
   Re: Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS, U.S. Air    
   16 Apr 07 18:25:23   
   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order   
      
   On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:19:38 -0400, "Dogchain"    
   wrote:   
      
   >   
   > wrote in message   
   >news:85u4231okmnqjt1o4foiv900jlf0fbk4tc@4ax.com...   
   >> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 10:00:52 -0400, "Dogchain"    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> wrote in message   
   >>>news:t173239ainu020i59o0ab08a9bcvo6iuh7@4ax.com...   
   >>>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 20:06:16 -0400, "Dogchain"    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> wrote in message   
   >>>>>news:k31b1359245kkdfm30o8krkhk6iv727kct@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>> On 5 Apr 2007 02:23:13 -0700, "Day Brown"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>More to the point is that the group think about 911 is breaking down.   
   >>>>>>>I really would like to see the evidence, but the only place to present   
   >>>>>>>*evidence* is in a legal proceeding where the witnesses have to   
   >>>>>>>present their credentials to prove they are who they say, and swear   
   >>>>>>>under oath and penalty of perjury.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Anyone can post anything on the net and claim to be whatever they   
   >>>>>>>think will improve their credibility. The problem with not having a   
   >>>>>>>court or congressional hearing is that these posted reports are   
   >>>>>>>gradually increasing and damaging the credibility of those in   
   >>>>>>>government, both Republicans and Democrats.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>I dont claim to know what happened on 911. In fact, I claim *NOT* to   
   >>>>>>>know, and I'd like to get this issue settled so we can quit wasting   
   >>>>>>>space on ad hominum and move on to some of the other issues that need   
   >>>>>>>to be dealt with.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>If Col Razer has a case, then surely he can find some citizen of New   
   >>>>>>>York city who suffered damages on 911 to bring a civil case against   
   >>>>>>>Silverstein. With all the 911 websites, why havnt any of them already   
   >>>>>>>done this to prove they are right? Didnt Silverstein receive billions?   
   >>>>>>>Isnt there *money* to be made by smart lawyers? Arent there any smart   
   >>>>>>>lawyers in New York city? If the 911 websites are correct, then isnt   
   >>>>>>>there the *EVIDENCE* to present in a class action civil suit?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Hello? Why are we talking about this here, when there are millions to   
   >>>>>>>be made by smart lawyers in New York? WTF?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Because the "smart lawyers" know that there isn't a case.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Or perhaps looking at the law...getting the ducks in a row.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Or not.   
   >>>   
   >>>Because out here on Usenet you, wussyboi, are a structural engineer, tax   
   >>>lawyer, civil attorney with Krekin-like abilities. bwahahahahah   
   >>   
   >> Maybe you should point out where I've ever claimed   
      
   >Wussyboi doesn't need to claim he is to play one.   
      
   And once again, Bryan the coward is caught in a lie.   
      
      
   >>any of the above,   
   >> coward.  But then you're just a cowardly liar.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >The wussyboi calls me a coward after not wanting to follow through with his   
   >Usenet bravery. A real knee slapper.   
      
   It wasn't my "usenet bravery", coward.  You offered the challenge.   
      
   >>>>>I've already said anytime (@ your convenience) ...just let me know.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Isn't that right, wussyboi?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Name a date and time, coward.   
   >>>   
   >>>What part of the original conversation "anytime (@ your convenience)   
   >>>...just   
   >>>let me know" don't you wanna understand, wussyboi?   
   >   
   >   
   >>   
   >> You're the one who said:   
   >   
   >I know what I stated, wussyboi. What part of the original conversation   
   >"anytime (@ your convenience) ...just let me know" don't you wanna   
   >understand, wussyboi?   
   >   
   >Bwahahah.   
   >   
   >   
   > The coward is still hiding.   
      
   Bryan "dogbutt" Pataky issued this challenge:   
      
   "You wanna man up and call me that to my face, wussy?"   
      
   Which was accepted.  A place to meet has been named as demanded by   
   Bryan the Coward - Leavenworth, Kansas.  But Bryan the coward doesn't   
   want to meet there, probably because he couldn't bring along any bully   
   boy friends.  He's shown time and again that he is desperate to know   
   my home address.  Obviously he has some sort of vision  to make life   
   difficult for me.   
      
   Bryan, the coward, is the one who said:   
      
    "It be useful if you gave me a time so I can be @ this address and   
   not one of my others.  I am very busy at certain times of the month."   
      
   It just really burns in Bryan's gut that I know who he is and he   
   doesn't have a clue about me.  He thinks that everyone in the world   
   should be as stupid as he is about scattering his identity around the   
   Internet.   He's tried and tried to find out my address.  He just   
   absolutely foams at the mouth over it.   
      
   If you're so brave Bryan, why don't you name a date and time to   
   fulfill your original challenge?  But we all know that you won't.  And   
   even if you do, you won't show up.  You've no intent to meet me or   
   anyone at any place.  You're just a coward.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca