XPost: alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.thebird.copwatch, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.law-enforcement, can.talk.guns, ab.general   
   XPost: bc.general, van.general   
   From: klunk@theothershoe.org   
      
   "MP"  wrote in message   
   news:46c2484b$0$16525$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...   
   > Looser, and a sore one at that LOL   
      
   lol... since you've chosen to avoid the issues yet again, apparently you   
   are.. go back to school and learn to spell, you trailer trash reject...   
      
      
   > "klunk"  wrote in message   
   > news:wBrwi.58481$_d2.34946@pd7urf3no...   
   >>   
   >> "MP"  wrote in message   
   >> news:46c22d77$0$28802$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...   
   >>>   
   >>>> lol... apparently that went over your head... wutta maroon...   
   >>>   
   >>> The original post went over your head you imbecile. You didn't offer an   
   >>> argument only a anti gun knee jerk name calling reaction. You obviously   
   >>> don't get it. Let me clue you in. Read this again you fucking retard.   
   >>   
   >> well... it's about time you actually got around to making an effort to   
   >> address the arguments posited... as pitiful as that effort actually   
   >> turned out to be, at least you attempted to engage your brain and work it   
   >> a bit...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>> Heard on the news this am that a cop in Ontario was killed by a   
   >>>> vehicle.   
   >>>> This begs the questions:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> - - was the vehicle registered?   
   >>>   
   >>> probably   
   >>> (HELLO, that's the point)   
   >>   
   >> so, you support gun registration programs   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>> - - was the driver licensed?   
   >>>   
   >>> likely   
   >>> (Again HELLO, that's the point again.)   
   >>   
   >> and you support licensing programs for guns   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>> - - was the vehicle stolen from the rightful owner and if so, is he/she   
   >>>> facing   
   >>>   
   >>> only if the owner was complicit in the crime -   
   >>> (Of course..Owner of a gun is complicit if his or her gun was stolen   
   >>> then used in a crime.)   
   >>   
   >> that's not true if the owner had reported their gun stolen.. but, that's   
   >> not really the point of his musing is it?...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>> charges for improper storage?   
   >>>   
   >>> define that-   
   >>> (Duh.. Were there any additional criminal charges filed if  the car   
   >>> wasn't locked in a container with a steering wheel lock on and the fuel   
   >>> locked in a different container? You obviously don't know gun laws.)   
   >>   
   >> lol... you obviously have a hard-on for comparing apples and oranges...   
   >> but, let's go with this one for a bit... with a simple question - Can you   
   >> conceal your car on your person?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>> - - will there be a huge funeral procession for the fallen Officer as   
   >>>> there   
   >>>> would be had he been shot?   
   >>>   
   >>> why wouldn't there be?   
   >>> (How about because he wasn't killed in the line of duty)   
   >>   
   >> what does that have to do with the issue of guns versus cars?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>> - - will there be an immediate call for increased controls and more   
   >>>> stringent   
   >>>> regulations for first time drivers?   
   >>>   
   >>> why would there be?...   
   >>> (Because there is every year with guns and it was a crime with another   
   >>> dangerous weapon, a car.)   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> cars are already far more regulated than guns... and cars are designed   
   >> for and serve other purposes than killing or target practice... if you   
   >> idiots truly wish to point to cars as an example of inconsistently   
   >> applied regulations, then you should be calling for all guns to be   
   >> strictly regulated AND outfitted with rfid chips to enable gps   
   >> tracking...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>> - - will the Opposition parties oppose increased penalties for such   
   >>>> crimes as   
   >>>> a deterrent?   
   >>>   
   >>> why would there be an increase in penalties for a crime that's only ever   
   >>> happened once?   
   >>> (Once? It happens all of the time.)   
   >>   
   >> and yet, you've not provided any cite for your bullshit claim...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>> - - will the perpetrator be out on bail pending a court date?   
   >>>   
   >>> maybe, maybe not... follow the case instead of spouting speculative   
   >>> stupidity...(Illogical, you're missing the point)   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> what's illogical is your fomenting stupidity over a non sequitur... bail   
   >> is set by a judge using criteria deemed applicable to individual cases...   
   >> whether guns or cars or toy bats are involved, idiot... your stupidity   
   >> shines very clearly with this one...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>> - -does he/she have a string of such offences for which he/she has   
   >>>> never   
   >>>> served time other than house arrest?   
   >>>   
   >>> maybe, maybe not... follow the case instead of spouting speculative   
   >>> stupidity......(Blah blah blah)   
   >>   
   >> and so, you resort to your native tongue of stupidity instead of   
   >> acknowledging the pathetic ignorance demonstrated by the original   
   >> poster...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>> - - if the perpetrator is a recent immigrant from a Third World   
   >>>> country, will   
   >>>> he/she be put on the next plane following trial and punishment?   
   >>>   
   >>>>maybe, maybe not... follow the case instead of spouting speculative   
   >>>>stupidity......(Blah blah blah)   
   >>   
   >> more of your own brand of blatant stupidity...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>>> - - will there be an immediate 'refugee claimant' hue and cry to   
   >>>>> prevent this?   
   >>>   
   >>>>maybe, maybe not... follow the case instead of spouting speculative   
   >>>>stupidity......(Blah blah blah)   
   >>   
   >> and still nothing remotely resembling intelligent thought...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Only in Canada, you say? .... pity .....   
   >>>   
   >>>>yes... it certainly is a pity that gun freaks haven't the slightest clue   
   >>>>not only how idiotic they sound when they whine like hypocritical   
   >>>>children... but also how pitifully disconnected from reality they prove   
   >>>>themselves to be when grasping at straws...   
   >>>   
   >>> What a stupid response. Not even close to getting it. Do you see how   
   >>> idiotic you sound. Read it again you fucking retard.   
   >>   
   >> lol... take a pill idiot... and read your own stupidity when you've   
   >> calmed down... perhaps, you might be lucky enough to be embarassed with   
   >> yourself...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> Also what you are confused about is that most gun freaks aren't   
   >>> criminals and most criminals are not gun freaks.   
   >>> In fact, most gun freaks are upstanding citizens and protectors of   
   >>> whining little shits like you who think they know it all and like   
   >>> putting down anybody who doesn't think like them just to feel self   
   >>> important. I'm all for gun regulations if they make sense but I can't   
   >>> stand idiots like you.   
   >>> If you don't get it now then your either retarded, a druggie, or a kid.   
   >>   
   >> no... not all gun freaks are criminals... most are merely irrational   
   >> freaks like yourself whom seem to be insistent in the irrational belief   
   >> that guns somehow should be granted special status for their ownership...   
   >>   
   >> btw fuckhead, pkb.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)