XPost: alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.thebird.copwatch, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.law-enforcement, can.talk.guns, ab.general   
   XPost: bc.general, van.general   
   From: klunk@theothershoe.org   
      
   "MP"  wrote in message   
   news:46c26af2$0$18746$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...   
   > Why respond anymore, you're a fucking retard!   
      
   was that an admission to your mirror of your ineptitude... or was that what   
   your boyfriend said to you when you asked to have sex with him?   
      
   > You missed the point completely.   
      
   not at all... neither the pointless whining of hypocritical gun freaks too   
   stupid to know what a non sequitur is, nor the one formed by the shape of   
   your thick skull...   
      
      
   > But you're a good name calling little shithead.   
      
   lol... more pkb... except that you're quite lousy at coming up with creative   
   insults... which is no surprise because ineptitude is ineptitude, no matter   
   how it finds expression... ;-)   
      
      
   > That's about all you seem to be able to do.   
      
   and yet, you've not even bothered to stay on point and actually make an   
   effort to rebut my counter-arguments OR answer my questions OR admit to your   
   failure to do either... but, i've learned from my experiences here that   
   witless idiots rarely are capable of demonstrating any capacity for   
   objective self-assessements, instead prefering to hurl childish invectives   
   like preschoolers swallowed up with rage during their tantrum...   
      
   when you do finally gain some composure, try not to forget that you opened   
   up your address to my post with an insult and now, because you can't take   
   the same kind of shit you dish out; you run away tossing more feeble   
   invectives like every frightened hypocrite does while whining over their   
   victimhood to find a dank and dark corner to hide in and lick their   
   wounds... should i call you a waaaahmbulance?   
      
      
   > So seeya.   
      
   doubtful... unless you get a stronger prescription for that severe myopia   
   you apparently suffer from....   
      
      
      
   > "klunk"  wrote in message   
   > news:roswi.58675$_d2.34700@pd7urf3no...   
   >>   
   >> "MP"  wrote in message   
   >> news:46c2484b$0$16525$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...   
   >>> Looser, and a sore one at that LOL   
   >>   
   >> lol... since you've chosen to avoid the issues yet again, apparently you   
   >> are.. go back to school and learn to spell, you trailer trash reject...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> "klunk"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:wBrwi.58481$_d2.34946@pd7urf3no...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "MP"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:46c22d77$0$28802$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> lol... apparently that went over your head... wutta maroon...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The original post went over your head you imbecile. You didn't offer   
   >>>>> an argument only a anti gun knee jerk name calling reaction. You   
   >>>>> obviously don't get it. Let me clue you in. Read this again you   
   >>>>> fucking retard.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> well... it's about time you actually got around to making an effort to   
   >>>> address the arguments posited... as pitiful as that effort actually   
   >>>> turned out to be, at least you attempted to engage your brain and work   
   >>>> it a bit...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> Heard on the news this am that a cop in Ontario was killed by a   
   >>>>>> vehicle.   
   >>>>>> This begs the questions:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> - - was the vehicle registered?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> probably   
   >>>>> (HELLO, that's the point)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> so, you support gun registration programs   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> - - was the driver licensed?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> likely   
   >>>>> (Again HELLO, that's the point again.)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> and you support licensing programs for guns   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> - - was the vehicle stolen from the rightful owner and if so, is   
   >>>>>> he/she facing   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> only if the owner was complicit in the crime -   
   >>>>> (Of course..Owner of a gun is complicit if his or her gun was stolen   
   >>>>> then used in a crime.)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> that's not true if the owner had reported their gun stolen.. but,   
   >>>> that's not really the point of his musing is it?...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> charges for improper storage?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> define that-   
   >>>>> (Duh.. Were there any additional criminal charges filed if  the car   
   >>>>> wasn't locked in a container with a steering wheel lock on and the   
   >>>>> fuel locked in a different container? You obviously don't know gun   
   >>>>> laws.)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> lol... you obviously have a hard-on for comparing apples and oranges...   
   >>>> but, let's go with this one for a bit... with a simple question - Can   
   >>>> you conceal your car on your person?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> - - will there be a huge funeral procession for the fallen Officer as   
   >>>>>> there   
   >>>>>> would be had he been shot?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> why wouldn't there be?   
   >>>>> (How about because he wasn't killed in the line of duty)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> what does that have to do with the issue of guns versus cars?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> - - will there be an immediate call for increased controls and more   
   >>>>>> stringent   
   >>>>>> regulations for first time drivers?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> why would there be?...   
   >>>>> (Because there is every year with guns and it was a crime with another   
   >>>>> dangerous weapon, a car.)   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> cars are already far more regulated than guns... and cars are designed   
   >>>> for and serve other purposes than killing or target practice... if you   
   >>>> idiots truly wish to point to cars as an example of inconsistently   
   >>>> applied regulations, then you should be calling for all guns to be   
   >>>> strictly regulated AND outfitted with rfid chips to enable gps   
   >>>> tracking...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> - - will the Opposition parties oppose increased penalties for such   
   >>>>>> crimes as   
   >>>>>> a deterrent?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> why would there be an increase in penalties for a crime that's only   
   >>>>> ever   
   >>>>> happened once?   
   >>>>> (Once? It happens all of the time.)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> and yet, you've not provided any cite for your bullshit claim...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> - - will the perpetrator be out on bail pending a court date?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> maybe, maybe not... follow the case instead of spouting speculative   
   >>>>> stupidity...(Illogical, you're missing the point)   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> what's illogical is your fomenting stupidity over a non sequitur...   
   >>>> bail is set by a judge using criteria deemed applicable to individual   
   >>>> cases... whether guns or cars or toy bats are involved, idiot... your   
   >>>> stupidity shines very clearly with this one...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> - -does he/she have a string of such offences for which he/she has   
   >>>>>> never   
   >>>>>> served time other than house arrest?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> maybe, maybe not... follow the case instead of spouting speculative   
   >>>>> stupidity......(Blah blah blah)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> and so, you resort to your native tongue of stupidity instead of   
   >>>> acknowledging the pathetic ignorance demonstrated by the original   
   >>>> poster...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)