Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.america-at-war    |    Debating how war is good for business    |    4,706 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,818 of 4,706    |
|    oldpink to Leif    |
|    Re: Handgun ban in U.S. capital could re    |
|    14 Sep 07 07:14:09    |
      XPost: can.talk.guns, alt.guns, alt.rec.guns       XPost: talk.politics.guns       From: oldpink@nltc.net              Leif wrote:       [...]       >>>If the Framers had thought it necessary to protect the personal arms       >>>rights of individuals, it would simply have added the word "arms" to       >>>the 4th Amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their       >>>persons, houses, ARMS, papers, and effects..."       >>       >>Arms are effects. So it is already included. Thus by your argument the       >>Framers protected the personal arms rights of individuals in the 4th       >>Amendment.- Hide quoted text -       >>       >>- Show quoted text -       >       >       > Leif speaking: What definition do you use that says that arms are       > "effects" but that houses and papers are not?              God damn! but if you aren't a pinhead!       In your world, what's up is down, and what's right is left.              "WordNet (r) 2.0"       effects        n : property of a personal character that is portable but not        used in business; "she left some of her personal effects        in the house"; "I watched over their effects until they        returned" syn: personal effects              --       And what exactly is a joke?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca