XPost: can.talk.guns, alt.guns, alt.rec.guns   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Bert Hyman"  wrote in message   
   news:Xns99AB67E8B69DFVeebleFetzer@127.0.0.1...   
   > none@none.com (Peter Franks) wrote in   
   > news:Q9xGi.95654$GO6.30934@newsfe21.lga:   
   >   
   >> Help me understand the constitutional basis for 'incorporation'...   
   >> I can't find anything about selective application in Amendment XIV,   
   >> or anywhere else in the Constitution for that matter...   
   >   
   > Regardless of what "balance of power" or "checks and balances" you   
   > think might have been intended, since the Supreme Court gave itself   
   > the role of sole and final interpreter of the Constitution in the   
   > Marbury v. Madison decision of 1803, the Constitution says whatever   
   > they say it says.   
      
   Perhaps, but we can also recognize they are acting improperly and contrary   
   to the constraints imposed by the Constitution.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)