[continued from previous message]   
      
   >> provide a "military context" that justifies changing its meaning. ***   
   >>   
   >   
   > True, but because the word "militia" appears it gives a damn good start at   
   > reasoning the type of weapons protected by the amendment.   
      
   On the contrary, it only established, at best, the minimum level of arms   
   that shall be protected. It in no manner imposes a restriction on the arms   
   that are protected.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)