XPost: can.talk.guns, alt.guns, alt.rec.guns   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: Nope@noway.net   
      
   SaPeIsMa wrote:   
   >   
   > "RSweeney"  wrote in message   
   > news:EpWdnfTwu8i5j3bbnZ2dnUVZ_vihnZ2d@comcast.com...   
   >>   
   >> "Leif"  wrote in message   
   >>   
   >>> Leif speaking:  The Supreme Court has not incorporated the Second   
   >>> Amendment against the states.  There's no reason why the ever should,   
   >>> since the Second Amendment was intended to defend the state militia   
   >>> system.   
   >>   
   >> The right to bear arms was SPECIFICALLY referred to in the Senate   
   >> debate on the 14th amendment. It's denial to free black citizens by   
   >> certain southern states was one of the stated reasons for the 14th.   
   >>   
   >> On the other hand, there is nothing in the 14th nor in it's debate   
   >> that allows SCOTUS to decide which enumerated rights are protected and   
   >> which are not.   
   >>   
   >> Incorporation is a fraud.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Do you know where I could read the debates on the 14th amendment that   
   > discusses the 2nd ?   
   > I would love to add that to my references.   
   >   
      
      
   Try here for as a starting point:   
      
   http://www.constitution.org/col/intent_14th.htm   
   Intent of the Fourteenth Amendment was to Protect All Rights   
   Jon Roland, 2000 Sep. 24   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)