XPost: can.talk.guns, alt.guns, alt.rec.guns   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: Nope@noway.net   
      
   The Lone Weasel wrote:   
   > Magus  said:   
   >   
      
   >>>> Where in the modern militia laws do you see where women   
   >>>> are specifically excluded?   
      
   >>> In the Massachusetts Militia Statute of 1785, you   
   >>> miserable pissant.  Adams says "the militia comprehends   
   >>> the whole people."  This is the most complete   
   >>> Massachusetts militia statute just 2 years prior to the   
   >>> above quote by Adams.   
   >>>   
      
   So, you think the Massachusetts Militia Statute of 1785 is "modern"?   
      
      
      
   >>> Read the fucking statute and tell us what the phrase "the   
   >>> militia comprehends the whole people" meant to Adams in   
   >>> 1787, because Adams is talking about the Massachusetts   
   >>> militia, right Magoo?   
   >>>   
   >>> Who does the Massachusetts militia of 1787 comprehend?   
   >>>   
   >>>> I'd ask for an honest response, but as you've evidenced   
   >>>> so many times in the past, you'll lie and make shit up to   
   >>>> further your agenda.   
   >>> Make shit up do I?   
   >> You damn straight you do. I've pointed it out several   
   >> times. You doing so goes back several years.   
   >   
   > So why are you afraid to read a 1785 militia statute, Magoo?   
   > I read it again today.  Some idiot made fun of me for knowing   
   > how to read the long S in 18th C. texts.   
   >   
   > Does the long S frighten you, Magoo?  Or is it the actual text   
   > that contains some many factual contradictions to the   
   > gunlobby's version of history - and you too lazy, and maybe   
   > not bright enough to figure it out for yourself.   
   >   
   > Poor lil gunloon.  You're too weak to make up your own mind.   
   >   
   > Next.   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)