XPost: alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, soc.support.fat-acceptance   
   From: tardis@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam   
      
   > I agree with the principle regarding those two characters... however,   
   > when push comes to shove, it was a wasted vote and no vote should   
   > be wasted when cast in times like these.   
      
   But it wasn't wasted...  A vote for third party is NOT a wasted vote.   
      
   Did I want to vote for Bush?  No, he sucks...   
   Did I want to vote for Kerry?  No, he also sucks...   
      
   I vote for who I WANT, not who I think has the better chance of beating   
   out the bigger screw-up.   
      
   > Play all of the games you   
   > like in the primaries and on the local level, with all of the parties you   
   > care to.... but in the 'big' race, cast a vote that will COUNT for change.   
      
   Are you HONESTLY telling me that Kerry would have changed things for the   
   better?  Do you REALLY think that?  Oh, I'm sure he would have changed   
   SOME things, but there is NO WAY you can convince me that his changes   
   would be BETTER.  Nader, on the other hand, WOULD have made BETTER change,   
   period.   
      
   You think a vote for Nader was a vote for Bush.  I think a vote for Kerry   
   was a vote for big business status quo.  You wasted YOUR vote, not the   
   other way around.  You see, I was counted in the 7% of American voters   
   that do not accept the way things are going, you were counted in the 93%   
   that accepts things the way they are.  Good going...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)