XPost: alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, soc.support.fat-acceptance
From: findme@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm
"The Master" wrote in message
news:Pine.NEB.4.64.0711091739480.13534@sdf.lonestar.org...
> I vote for who I WANT, not who I think has the better chance of beating
> out the bigger screw-up.
It depends on how badly we need change. "Playing" with the system,
no matter how bad it sucks, is just that... play.
> Are you HONESTLY telling me that Kerry would have changed things for the
> better? Do you REALLY think that? Oh, I'm sure he would have changed
> SOME things, but there is NO WAY you can convince me that his changes
> would be BETTER.
Nice rant. I respect your concepts. I didn't talk about candidates.
I don't even know where your knee-jerking self came up with that.
Scream all you like... you're not changing anything, and neither did
your vote.
> Nader, on the other hand, WOULD have made
> BETTER change, period.
By election day, it was blatantly obvious than Nader never stood a
snowball's chance in hell.
All I suggest is that when you KNOW that your party is in the shitter,
make a better decision. I freely admit that in 2004, this did not apply.
> You think a vote for Nader was a vote for Bush.
I don't know what you're talking about, but with all of the compromised
voting machines that the Bush cronies put in place, it was quite possible.
> You wasted YOUR vote,
FWIW, loudmouth... I have voted thoroughly independent most of my
life - and in 2004, for the first time on over 40 years, I did not vote in
the presidential election. I knew full well that Bush and Kerry were
both on the same side.
http://www.vestigialconscience.com/bush-s-and-b.wmv
http://www.vestigialconscience.com/kerry-s-and-b.wmv
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
