XPost: alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:26:52 -0400, "Topp@Work"
wrote:
>
>"Freedom Fighter" wrote in message
>news:n8ONj.205182$cQ1.101063@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> "Topp@Work" wrote in message
>> news:vqadnVePZ60KzZrVnZ2dnUVZ_jKdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>> >
>> > "Freedom Fighter" wrote in message
>> > news:GysNj.103279$D_3.41913@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> >> Who nailed who to a cross?
>> >
>> > No one.
>> > Prove Jesus even existed.
>>
>> Good point, but Jesus or his alleged teachings WERE "liberal."
>>
>> >> Who were the Loyalists to the totalitarian monarchy of King George?
>> > Sheeple, like all liberals.
>>
>> KKKon$ervatives, who always resist change and greater freedom, and are the
>> source and defenders of tyrrany.
>
>Hardly.
>Loyalists liked to be dictated to, and didn't want change.....
>
>
>>
>> >> Who started our Civil War to defend slavery?
>> >
>> > You have been brain washed. The Civil war was begun as a war of States
>> > Rights Vs. Federal rights. Lincoln "freed the Slaves" as a last ditch
>> > effort to keep union support for the war as cities like NY and boston
>were
>> > in total chaos with people fighting in the streets-
>>
>> No more so than during the anti-Vietnam war demonstration days.
>
>Very different.....
>
>>
>> > Proof- if the Civil war was about slavery, and started in 1861, why
>> > weren't
>> > the slaves "freed" until the Emancipation Proclimation which was 1863?
>> > hrmmm....2 years of war that had nothing to do with freeing slaves....
>>
>> One of the MAJOR issues of that time was slavery. The South used the
>"states
>> rights" principle to defend the practice.
>
>But yet, you can't even say that the war was started over slavery...It was
>started over an
>economic disadvantage the south had....
>90% of manufacturing was in the north, along with the transportation
>(railroads)..
>Thats the pure fact
>
It is actually fact and a concern going all the way back to the
founding of the country.
>>
>> > Complain to the liberals who changed the school curiculum to omit that
>> > fact.
>>
>> KKKon$ervatives don't rewrite history when it is to their advantage, I
>> suppose?
>
>Rainbow curriculum has no place in schools...
>
>> How come we are not taught the fact that Pearl Harbor was ALLOWED TO
>HAPPEN?
>
>Cite your proof....
>Cause thats hardly the truth.
>
>>
>> >> Who fought to keep women as property, and now fights their
>> >> sovereignty over their own bodies in the freedom to choose
>> >> abortion?
>> >
>> > No one ever fought to keep women as property.
>>
>> Many women consider attempts to legally dictate to them about abortion,
>> birth control, etc. to be just that.
>
>But yet no one fought for women to be property, regardless of how someone
>"felt"....
>
>>
>> >> Who fought against child labor statutes?
>> >
>> > ALL wealth people. They got wealthy on cheap labor. For all of human
>> > existance, children WORKED. Until some genuis thought we should spoil
>> > them
>> > with video games and cell phones. By your very thought, it's a miracle
>> > humans made it past the neanderthal.
>>
>> You consider all the time they are obligated to be in school not to be
>work?
>> KKKon$ervatives are STILL largely Neanderthals, despite their
>> noose-of-conformity neckties and spiffy suits!
>
>Ah...I hit another truth and you can only spew names calling again....
>
>>
>> >> Who fought against the concept of free public education?
>> >
>> > No one. Free public education has been part of the US for many many
>> > years.
>> > We have had public schools since the 1800's
>> >
>> >
>> >> Who fought against the right of women to vote?
>> >
>> > Most Men.
>>
>> Not those you would call "liberal."
>
>Most men, liberal and not liberal....
>Cite your proof Liberal men (majority of them) helped women get the right to
>vote.
>
>>
>> >> Who fought against anti-trust and anti-monopoly legislation?
>> >
>> > People who were poor.
>>
>> Say what?
>> It was the monopolies and others that would have a bit less wealth and
>power
>> as a result, OBVIOUSLY!
>
>Liberals were the ones in most power then...Look at the Astor family.....
>
>>
>> >> Who fought against workers organizing?
>> >
>> > Business
>>
>> Backed by the KKKon$ervative politicians they bought.
>
>Yet again, names come from an intolerant liberl with no proof of his
>claims...
>
>>
>> >> Who fought against government controls on manufacturers of cars
>> >> "unsafe at any speed?"
>> >
>> > Morons....
>>
>> KKKon$ervatives with a vested interest in the deadly status quo.
>
>And again names as "proof".
>
>>
>> >> Who killed several thousand innocent civilians in the 9/11
>> >> terrorist attacks?
>> >
>> > A bunch of ragheads
>>
>> "Ragheads" in the white house?
>> I know - their suits and flags are only a disguise for covert Homeland
>> Terrorists.
>
>Cite your proof....Oh...you can't...cause you believe everything is a
>conspiracy....
>
>>
>> >> Who started WW2, murdered 13 million and caused the death of 40
>> >> million more?
>> >
>> > The world did by doing nothing as Hitler roase to power.
>>
>> Just as they did nothing when Bush, et al, did the same.
>
>LOL...you really need professiona help....
>
>>
>> >> CONSERVATIVES OR LIBERALS?
>> >
>> > Both and neither....Learn history
>> > The robber barons were LIBERALS.
>> > Getty, Morgan, Stanley, Rockerfeller....All Liberals....
>>
>> Look up the dictionary definition of LIBERAL and see how wrong you are.
>
>Uhn huh....
>look at the Kennedys and how they were bootleggers, then Big Businesss for
>their claims to fame....
>
>
>
--
"Before all else, be armed" -- Machiavelli
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
