XPost: alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights   
      
   On Sat, 24 May 2008 10:05:55 -0500, who@where.com wrote:   
      
   >On Thu, 22 May 2008 19:45:41 -0400, Zomby-Woof@cox.net wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Wed, 21 May 2008 23:11:44 -0500, who@where.com wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 09:18:21 -0500, "MasterChief" <1@nowhere.com> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>Fags has no business telling men not to have guns.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>"Paul Hands"  wrote in message   
   >>>>news:b5217912-5d28-4688-a8a0-d3d1ef852902@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...   
   >>>>> Guns have no place in a civilised society.  Neither does religion.   
   >>>>   
   >>>Yeah, right. Only the robbers, muggers, rapist and killers should have   
   >>>guns.  The problem is that when you take guns away from everyone, gun   
   >>>crimes may go down, but all other violence with other weapons increases   
   >>>far beyond what it was when honest people could carry a gun.   
   >>>   
   >>The biggest problem is that criminals ignore the Gun Laws just like to   
   >>all the other ones regarding their illegal behaviors.  Sure one can   
   >>put an end to legal weapons possession, but all the "Gun Laws" in the   
   >>world don't put an end to the illegal possession.   
   >>   
   >>>In England these days, daytime burglaries are as common as night   
   burglaries. Who   
   >>>cares if anyone is home? After all, the don't have a gun, and if they   
   >>>even hurt a home invader or burglar too severely, the homeowner goes to   
   >>>prison. Neat system, eh?  You want that here? Just take guns away from   
   >>>honest people, and many of us will standby, bound and gagged,  while the   
   >>>bastards with the guns, knives, whatever,  rape our wives and daughters.   
   >>>Yeah, neat system alright.   
   >>>   
   >>Most do that in the current system since we've pretty much   
   >>figuratively neutered every male on the planet into being a she-male   
   >>wannabe.  Even if armed the average "Liberal" would probably end up   
   >>shitting himself prior to protecting their loved ones.   
   >   
   >The average lib would never carry a gun. The exception is the lib pols   
   >who do carry them and have gotten caught doing it. Of course they've all   
   >had excuses, which mainly were in so many words, "We're important.   
   >You're not."   
   >   
   >>BTW -- Anyone track the level of Violent Crime in Australia after   
   >>their gun ban went into affect?  The numbers did move in the direction   
   >>expected.  However, in those states in the US that have gone to a   
   >>"Shall Issue" CCW Permit process & Castle Doctrine Laws have seen a   
   >>reduction in violent crime.   
   >   
   >Thank goodness I live in one of those states. Anyone kicking down my   
   >door in the middle of the night is in for one helluva surprise. My guns   
   >ain't stored away in some room under a bed in a locked box. At least two   
   >are within arm's reach.   
   >   
   If one is going to lock em up, they really aren't going to be much use   
   for which they were designed.   
   --   
   "Before all else, be armed" -- Machiavelli   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)