XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.terro   
   ism.world-trade-center   
      
   On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:32:56 -0400, BR  wrote:   
      
   >Sam Buckland wrote:   
   >> BR wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Welcome to my killfile.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Well, that's ONE way to be able to continue your support for your   
   >> kooky conspiracy theory...   
   >>   
   >> LOL!   
   >>   
   >   
   >You obviously have not been reading my messages carefully.  If I have   
   >one point that disagrees with you, you say "kooky conspiracy theory".   
      
   And when someone disagrees with you and provides citations and   
   evidence contrary to your beliefs, you killfile them.   
      
   >As I stated in other messages, I don't believe there where hidden bombs   
   >in WTC 1 and 2.  The impact of the airplanes was the cause of the   
   >failure, nothing more, nothing less.   
      
   Which isn't true either.  The buildings were still standing after the   
   aircraft impacts.  It was the damage done by the aircraft impacts plus   
   the effects of the fires in the buildings that caused the collapses.   
      
   >But a great deal of effort was   
   >expended to blame the attacks on Arabs.  It is known that the IDs of the   
   >alleged hijackers were fakes.  Since then 7 of the hijackers have since   
   >turned up alive and well, and cleared of any connection with the plot.   
      
   Which isn't true either.  But then you contradict yourself in the   
   space of two sentences.  If the IDs of the hijackers were fakes, how   
   could 7 of them have turned up alive and well?   
      
   >I add jerks to my killfile who stoop to calling people names who   
   >disagree with them.  Only one person on this list is willing to argue   
   >facts, rather than personalties.   
      
   You killfiled agent86 and he didn't call you names.  Why was that?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)