home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.america-at-war      Debating how war is good for business      4,706 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 4,333 of 4,706   
   Chuck Stamford to All   
   Re: "Whosoever shall smite thee on thy r   
   11 Aug 08 03:47:50   
   
   a713b446   
   XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife, alt.religion.christian.baptist   
   From: shell-stamford@cox.net   
      
    wrote in message   
   news:de093355-0589-41a1-8fad-6bed5bedd4b0@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...   
   > On Aug 11, 6:35 am, "Chuck Stamford"  wrote:   
   >>  wrote in message   
   >>   
   >> news:19492b56-bb66-4ea5-9ea1-320a553e10d4@a2g2000prm.googlegroups.com...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> > On Aug 10, 6:23 pm, "Preach The Word"    
   >> > wrote:   
   >> >>  wrote in message   
   >>   
   >> >>news:b02ed179-6c8c-4481-88c3-5e0a3fa0f61a@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...   
   >>   
   >> >> > On Aug 10, 5:53 pm, "A Watcher"  wrote:   
   >> >> >> "Chuck Stamford"  wrote in message   
   >>   
   >> >> >>news:cHmnk.15680$LF2.12142@newsfe09.iad...   
   >>   
   >> >> >> > "A Watcher"  wrote in message   
   >> >> >> >news:_zbnk.148082$Lw1.14166@newsfe29.ams2...   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> "Chuck Stamford"  wrote in message   
   >> >> >> >>news:GL7nk.15702$1N1.15195@newsfe07.iad...   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>> "Mike Painter"  wrote in message   
   >> >> >> >>>news:7h7nk.16194$cW3.6902@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com...   
   >> >> >> >>>> Chuck Stamford wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>>>>> You mean you do not find it disturbing and quite   
   >> >> >> >>>>>> inappropriate   
   >> >> >> >>>>>> for   
   >> >> >> >>>>>> Christ's brethren to fight and kill each other?   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>>>> Christ's "brethern" were enjoined by their God and Lord to   
   >> >> >> >>>>> obey   
   >> >> >> >>>>> the   
   >> >> >> >>>>> legitimate authorities over them, as all authority comes   
   >> >> >> >>>>> ultimately   
   >> >> >> >>>>> from Him.  The fact men exercise this God given authority   
   >> >> >> >>>>> over   
   >> >> >> >>>>> one   
   >> >> >> >>>>> another practically guarantees there will be conflicts.  Is   
   >> >> >> >>>>> there   
   >> >> >> >>>>> something in any of this you find contradictory?   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>>> Who decides which authority is right. That argument was used   
   >> >> >> >>>> by   
   >> >> >> >>>> kings   
   >> >> >> >>>> and emporers for thousands of years with great success.   
   >> >> >> >>>> If their authority comes from the same god(s) why is there no   
   >> >> >> >>>> piece   
   >> >> >> >>>> and   
   >> >> >> >>>> why did kings loose power?   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>>> Mark Twain's War Prayer sums it up nicely.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>> Not familiar with much of Mark Twain's body of work beyond Tom   
   >> >> >> >>> Sawyer.   
   >> >> >> >>> I liked that story as a kid.  It was nice to see that some   
   >> >> >> >>> kids,   
   >> >> >> >>> at   
   >> >> >> >>> least, got to have some fun.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>> But I digress.  As to you question:   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>> "Who decides which authority is right."   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>> God does.  All I need to know, as a disciple of Jesus Christ,   
   >> >> >> >>> is   
   >> >> >> >>> that   
   >> >> >> >>> the authority I'm following isn't an obvious enemy of the   
   >> >> >> >>> Gospel,   
   >> >> >> >>> or   
   >> >> >> >>> isn't requiring me to do something that directly contradicts a   
   >> >> >> >>> command   
   >> >> >> >>> of God as understood and interpreted by His Son, Jesus Christ.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> You mean like these direct commands......"43 Ye have heard that   
   >> >> >> >> it   
   >> >> >> >> hath   
   >> >> >> >> been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.   
   >> >> >> >> 44   
   >> >> >> >> But   
   >> >> >> >> I   
   >> >> >> >> say unto you, LOVE your ENEMIES, bless them that curse you, do   
   >> >> >> >> good   
   >> >> >> >> to   
   >> >> >> >> them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use   
   >> >> >> >> you,   
   >> >> >> >> and   
   >> >> >> >> persecute you;" Matt 5:43-44 (KJV)   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> "21 ``You have heard that the ancients were told, `YOU SHALL NOT   
   >> >> >> >> COMMIT   
   >> >> >> >> MURDER' and `Whoever, commits murder shall be liable to the   
   >> >> >> >> court.'   
   >> >> >> >> 22   
   >> >> >> >> ``But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother   
   >> >> >> >> shall   
   >> >> >> >> be   
   >> >> >> >> guilty before the court;" Matt 5:21-22 (NASB)   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> Which would certainly rule out killing any of them.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> > Are you suggesting the the proposition, "It's impossible to kill   
   >> >> >> > someone   
   >> >> >> > without being angry with them" is true?   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> "Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?   
   >> >> >> >> 18   
   >> >> >> >> And   
   >> >> >> >> Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none   
   >> >> >> >> good   
   >> >> >> >> but   
   >> >> >> >> one, that is, God. 19 Thou knowest the commandments, Do not   
   >> >> >> >> commit   
   >> >> >> >> adultery, Do NOT KILL, Do not steal...." Mark 10:17-19 (KJV)   
   >> >> >> >> See above.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> "38 Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and   
   >> >> >> >> a   
   >> >> >> >> tooth   
   >> >> >> >> for a tooth: 39 But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but   
   >> >> >> >> whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the   
   >> >> >> >> other   
   >> >> >> >> also." Matt 5:38-39 (KJV)   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> This is the commanded passive response to any form of attack on   
   >> >> >> >> the   
   >> >> >> >> person who is following Christ.   
   >> >> >> >> Christ does not say "Once he has smitten you on one cheek,   
   >> >> >> >> immediately   
   >> >> >> >> strike your adversary back on his" He says to offer the other   
   >> >> >> >> side   
   >> >> >> >> of   
   >> >> >> >> your face and allow him to hit the other.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> Is that not correct Chuck?   
   >>   
   >> >> >> > It most certainly is.  And?   
   >>   
   >> >> >> Is it not true Christ's brethren were commanded to love each other,   
   >> >> >> even   
   >> >> >> their enemies and do good to those who might despitefully use them?   
   >>   
   >> >> > I would have thought so, too.   
   >>   
   >> >> > Luke 12:51ff was given recently as the way His people should expect   
   >> >> > to   
   >> >> > carry themselves in public.   
   >>   
   >> >> > " ... Do you think that I have come to give peace on earth? No, I   
   >> >> > tell   
   >> >> > you, but rather division. For from now on in one house there will be   
   >> >> > five divided, three against two and two against three.   They will   
   >> >> > be   
   >> >> > divided, father against son and son against father, mother against   
   >> >> > daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against her   
   >> >> > daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law."   (Luk   
   >> >> > 12:51-53).   
   >>   
   >> >> > I begged to differ.   
   >>   
   >> >> About what?   
   >>   
   >> > Posture   
   >>   
   >> > I didn't think His discourse was ment to be read that way.   
   >>   
   >> Read in what way, Roy.  Be specific.   
   >   
   > Is the writer wanting to convey that we ought to be divide family   
   > members as described as normative engagement with the world?  Is our   
   > Lord wanting to say we do so likewise?   
   >   
   > The  appeal in Luke 12:13-14 serves as a backdrop to v.51ff. "Someone   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca