XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife, alt.religion.christian.baptist   
   From: shell-stamford@cox.net   
      
   "Mike Painter"  wrote in message   
   news:yUJok.17854$xZ.7785@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com...   
   > Chuck Stamford wrote:   
   >> "Mike Painter"  wrote in message   
   >> news:iMCok.4209$zv7.1598@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com...   
   >>> Chuck Stamford wrote:   
   >>>> "Mike Painter"  wrote in message   
   >>>>> I would have answered the question and shown it to be wrong.   
   >>>>> You just talk about it and snip the choices.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You express your opinions as if they were facts beyond the fact   
   >>>> they're your opinions.  That's nothing but pure arrogance, and I'm   
   >>>> not going to waste my time on that degree of arrogance.  Showing you   
   >>>> wrong is easy.  Getting it through to you that your thoughts do not   
   >>>> demarcate reality for us all isn't.   
   >>>> If you can control yourself to behave in a reasonable fashion, we   
   >>>> can have an adult discussion.  If not, I'm not interested in your   
   >>>> questions, or anything else you can think up to say or ask.  Ball's   
   >>>> in your court.   
   >>>   
   >>> Again you waste time telling me that you are not going to waste time   
   >>> explaining your comment.   
   >>> It would seem that explaining your statement would take less time.   
   >>> It does make clear why you defend JW.   
   >>   
   >> Fine, have it your way.  It's obvious you can't afford to proceed on   
   >> any other.   
   >>   
   > There was no discussion. Discussion's require people respond to the issues   
   > not talk about why they won't respond.   
      
   There was no discussion because you rhetorically frame all of your opinions   
   as facts, and can't seem to do otherwise, even now.   
      
      
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)