XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife, alt.religion.christian.baptist   
   From: shell-stamford@cox.net   
      
   "Mike Painter"  wrote in message   
   news:sSLok.17867$xZ.13681@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com...   
   > Chuck Stamford wrote:   
   >> "Mike Painter"  wrote in message   
   >> news:yUJok.17854$xZ.7785@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com...   
   >>> Chuck Stamford wrote:   
   >>>> "Mike Painter"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:iMCok.4209$zv7.1598@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com...   
   >>>>> Chuck Stamford wrote:   
   >>>>>> "Mike Painter"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>> I would have answered the question and shown it to be wrong.   
   >>>>>>> You just talk about it and snip the choices.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You express your opinions as if they were facts beyond the fact   
   >>>>>> they're your opinions.  That's nothing but pure arrogance, and I'm   
   >>>>>> not going to waste my time on that degree of arrogance.  Showing   
   >>>>>> you wrong is easy.  Getting it through to you that your thoughts   
   >>>>>> do not demarcate reality for us all isn't.   
   >>>>>> If you can control yourself to behave in a reasonable fashion, we   
   >>>>>> can have an adult discussion.  If not, I'm not interested in your   
   >>>>>> questions, or anything else you can think up to say or ask. Ball's in   
   >>>>>> your court.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Again you waste time telling me that you are not going to waste   
   >>>>> time explaining your comment.   
   >>>>> It would seem that explaining your statement would take less time.   
   >>>>> It does make clear why you defend JW.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Fine, have it your way.  It's obvious you can't afford to proceed on   
   >>>> any other.   
   >>>>   
   >>> There was no discussion. Discussion's require people respond to the   
   >>> issues not talk about why they won't respond.   
   >>   
   >> There was no discussion because you rhetorically frame all of your   
   >> opinions as facts, and can't seem to do otherwise, even now.   
   >   
   > Still unable to actually respond...   
      
   That was a response, knucklehead.  It just wasn't the response, you as the   
   Gengis Khan of dialogue, required.   
      
   And I'm going to have to seriously downgrade my initial estimate of your   
   intelligence, I'm afraid.  You've convinced me you really think what you're   
   doing is opaque to the discernment of others.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)