home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.america-at-war      Debating how war is good for business      4,706 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 4,606 of 4,706   
   Thomas Heger to All   
   Re: What Really Struck the Twin Towers?   
   23 Jun 18 13:38:25   
   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.conspiracy.new-world-order, alt.conspiracy.cabal   
   From: ttt_heg@web.de   
      
   Am 22.06.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Stuart Wright:   
   > The latest blog post from James Perloff suggests, as others have also   
   > said, that cloaked missiles, not drones, were used to strike the World   
   > Trade Center Towers and more.   
   >   
      
   There are MANY different theories about the reason, why the twin towers   
   fell and what could have possibly struck them.   
      
   I personally think, that Judy Wood's theory is correct, more or less.   
      
   The mechanism of destruction is actually very unusual. The closest   
   mechanism is called 'Hutchison effect', invented by the Canadian John   
   Hutchison.   
      
   Hutchison showed, that certain high voltage and high frequency beams   
   could, if carefully tuned, destroy steel.   
      
   The remains of the Twin Towers look a little similar to what Hutchison   
   produced on small scale.   
      
   Another assumption was, that some sort of 'time machine' was used, which   
   teleported the material into another dimension.   
      
   This is at least a little plausible, since from the roughly one million   
   tons of material the towers were build from only 10 to 20 percent were   
   found later.   
      
   So: where did the towers go? (that was Judy Wood's question).   
      
   Another theory tries to utilize 'scalar waves', possibly coming from a   
   spaceship and/or the Brookhaven National Lab.   
      
   There are also theories, the Russian 'woodpecker' signal or HAARP caused   
   the destruction.   
      
   But jets of any kind (or missiles) are imho not among the plausible   
   solutions to the WTC riddle.   
      
   Also explosives (even nukes) were assumed, but were unlikely used. This   
   would also rule out 'nano thermite' or similar.   
      
   TH   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca