From: rpuigdel@gmail.com   
      
   John A. Weeks III a écrit :   
   > In article <1138990630.017674.266800@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,   
   >  "tomcat"  wrote:   
   >   
   >> Without realizing it you are talking about yourself, your knowledge,   
   >> and your limitations.  To you the 'real world' is what 'you' have   
   >> experienced and regard as 'worthy' of factuality.   
   >   
   > Bunk.  The real world is what you can measure with a volt-ohm   
   > meter, and if you measure it 3 times, you get the same reading   
   > each of the 3 times.  So far, no body has come up with a method   
   > of measuring these foo-foo effects.   
   >   
   >> The "pottery thing" has been written about seriously by observers.   
   >   
   > So has psychic surgery.  Both are frauds.  In psychic surgery,   
   > the so-called surgeon has a piece of animal innards hidden on   
   > his body, and he/she pulls it out which everyone is focused on   
   > the chanting.  The pottery fraud is the same thing.  If you strip-   
   > search the psychic first, they cannot do the trick.  The pottery   
   > is hidden on their body.   
   >   
   >> "Warp" is being worked on at NASA by Physicists.   
   >   
   > Faster than light travel might be looked at, but there is no such   
   > thing as "warp".  It is a sub-space field, according to Star Trek,   
   > and subspace doesn't exist in real life.  Or not that we have   
   > discovered yet, nor seen data or a theory that would suggest that   
   > it should or could exist.  All those subspace particals on Star   
   > Trek are made up.   
   >   
   >> The Ice Cube is being   
   >> built in Antartical -- at considerable expense -- to experimentally   
   >> prove the existence of "other dimensions" that are predicted by Quantum   
   >> Theory.   
   >   
   > Those "dimensions" are folded so tight as to be smaller than   
   > microscopic.  No human could live there, and there certainly are   
   > not doorways where being move between these mathematical dimensions.   
   >   
   >> Billions of people believe in "reincarnation, heaven, and God"   
   >> and while that does not constitute a strict scientific 'proof', it does   
   >> justify pondering.   
   >   
   > Yes, one should ponder how so many people could be so wrong about   
   > something so important in light of a total lack of evidence to   
   > suggest that god is either possible or likely.  Just because   
   > billions of people think something doesn't mean anything.  After   
   > all, most people once thought the earth was flat.   
   >   
   >> Science has come a long way since the early 1800's.  These things   
   >> mentioned are the subject of 'real research' going on today in 'real   
   >> laboratories'.   
   >   
   > Great...when they find something, and publish it in a peer-reviewed   
   > journal, then lets talk about it.   
   >   
   >> And, yes, they are discovering "some really cool things".  Really!   
   >   
   > Yes, like Remote Viewing, which has now been fully debunked.   
   >   
   > -john-   
   >   
      
   If you think you can repeat every physics experiment it's because you   
   are probably a poor physicist   
      
   Some debunkers are just lame.   
      
      
   ray   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)