Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.area51    |    That little magical place in the desert    |    2,359 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,159 of 2,359    |
|    Lumpy to miso@sushi.com    |
|    Re: beacon direction finding    |
|    24 Mar 06 17:56:10    |
      From: lumpy@digitalcartography.com              miso@sushi.com wrote:       > I'm quite sure the null is better       > than the directional antenna              Then in approximately what manner       are you hoping to improve what parameter?       You want a stronger null?       or       You want more sensitivity?              They aren't exactly the same. Your smaller       loop is probably less sensitive but has       a higher Q, even if it's nowhere near tuned       to the freq.              Stick that smaller loop in front of the big loop.       Make the small one passive and the large loop active.       Vary the distance till you get a stronger       signal. That will be an increase in sensitivity       and an even bigger increase in selectivity (stronger null).              You're relatively close at 10 miles. If you were several       hundred miles, I'd suggest experimenting with a driven       broadside. Both loops active, side by side.              > ... It would be best to have a meter on the AGC,       > but I don't have any radios with such a tap from       > the factory...              I thought all S meters were coming off the AGC.              If you have the ears for it, I would trust headphones       before any kind of meter, digital or analog.              What's the nature of the signal that you're       DF'ing? CW, I presume. Theoretically it should       be much easier to DF a CW signal if you don't       know (or aren't tuned to) the exact RF freq.              Finally, 10 miles isn't very far, in terms of       where I assume you're working. You ought to be       able to almost shine a spotlight on the darn       thing at that distance. So I presume there's       some terra firma inbetween you and the xmitter.       Can you hit it from three directions and form       a "triangle of probability"? Once you have an       RF picture of where it "should" be, then look       at the topo to find where it "could" be. If       it's a transmitter, humans have to get to it       to service it.                     Lumpy       --       Were you the voice of Casper?       No. Popeye, Snagglepuss and Wells Fargo Bank.       www.lumpyvoice.net              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca