Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.area51    |    That little magical place in the desert    |    2,359 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,336 of 2,359    |
|    krackula@i.am to All    |
|    Re: Unsecured networks open door for hac    |
|    04 Jan 07 13:16:19    |
      XPost: alt.internet.wireless, rec.aviation.military              .... snipped for sanity ............                     hummmmmm ............. interesting. odd sounding tho , as the        " secure " areas that I'm familiar with are strictly " swept " on a       regular schedule and in between ( randomly ) to boot , plus have       strict sets of rules covering this kind of stuff.              usually a person ( worker or civilian ) has to ask for facility       permission to " transmit " anything in the secure or restricted       access areas ( including base housing ) and register their       transmitter. facilities are particularly alert to wi-fi ( vhf ham       gear, microwave transmitters including motion detectors ,       satellite internet operations etc. ) and even connecting to wi-fi       in town from the areas mentioned above ( using an outside gain       antenna for range ) , because they often access base related       resources or may pose interference issues with base equipment.       even " civilian only " usage ( say a satellite dish internet       connection ) often can translate to " base " information access       or interference of certain types and is subject to approval and close       scrutiny.       this approval process can sometimes take months and is often       disallowed with NO explanation. most of these types of places , these       days, provide their own wi-fi and / or internet connections to       eliminate this type of problem and provide their users with state of       the art internet / intranet resources.              you can bet that if that article was " really " the case , then some       base security people screwed up somewhere , someone on base is going       to be ( or has been ) hammered for breaking the rules, that because       they have made a public mention of it NO current possibilities for       unsecured wi-fi exists. they probably had to hammer some innocent but       " influential " home wi-fi user and made this public ( political )       attempt to explain it and smooth it all over somewhat ! ah aha hahaha       a              facility wardriving isn't what it once was , I can tell you for sure       ! in times past, enforcement of these       rules was pretty much laxidasical or nonexistent , but since homeland       defense got into full operation ( and all the other mil / government       / contractor security resources started having testosterone       competitions with those homeland guys ) ... strong enforcement and       checking / sweeping activities have been the " rule " . it's more       to do with everyone checking on everyone else and " being right " (       and justifying your own existence / budget and looking like you are       doing something ) than anything really to do with security ! |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca