XPost: alt.conspiracy, soc.culture.usa   
   From: quintal@francom.esoterisme   
      
   On Thu, 24 May 2007 21:43:05 -0400, Phoon Hencman    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 2007-05-24 04:08:36 -0400, "npsm"  said:   
   >   
   >> The Space Shuttle, so far, has killed fourteen people, merely trying to   
   >> attain an orbit about two hundred fifty miles above the Earth.   
   >>   
   >> How is it then, that a third of a century ago, with less computing power   
   >> in the entire rocket than in a present day twenty dollar Wal-Mart watch,   
   >> NASA claims to have gone 100,000% farther, six different times   
   >> between 1969 and 1972, landing on another celestial body and then   
   >> returning, without ever killing anyone?   
   >>   
   >> How could they have powered air conditioning in two hundred fifty   
   >> degree heat for three days with batteries?   
   >>   
   >> Why is the "second round" of "returning" to the moon estimated to be   
   >> no earlier than half a century after the first?   
   >>   
   >> (Would there be a fifty-year span between the first and second   
   >> trips across the Atlantic in an airplane?)   
   >>   
   >> If the moon landings were, as we believe, a government deception, then   
   >> George Orwell's comment, "whoever controls the past, controls the future"   
   >> is a scary wakeup call to insist that our government reform to the   
   >> truthfulness of our founding father "who could not tell a lie."   
   >>   
   >> Otherwise, the powers that be (The Zionist Network) will continue their   
   >> addiction to deception and we all will be worse off for it.   
   >   
   >   
   >Go back to sleep. We went, deal with it.   
      
   I'm really not sure.... or I'm really not sure that "we" didnt go to   
   the moon. Case in doubt.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)