From: BogusID@YesItIs.com   
      
   "npsm"  wrote in message news:f33h6p$gis$1@aioe.org...   
   > The Space Shuttle, so far, has killed fourteen people, merely trying to   
   > attain an orbit about two hundred fifty miles above the Earth.   
      
   I believe the word is "experimental".   
      
   The rockets to the moon were purpose specific, while the shuttle is NASA's   
   'do it all' platform of today.   
      
   >   
   > How is it then, that a third of a century ago, with less computing power   
   > in the entire rocket than in a present day twenty dollar Wal-Mart watch,   
   > NASA claims to have gone 100,000% farther, six different times   
   > between 1969 and 1972, landing on another celestial body and then   
   > returning, without ever killing anyone?   
      
   More computing power is not always better, for example many new cars must be   
   plugged into a dyno computer to talk tot he cars computer just to perform a   
   tune up. You should also consider that as accidents do occur, regulation,   
   triple-quad backup systems and all the other wonderful technologies make the   
   same task more challenging.   
      
   > How could they have powered air conditioning in two hundred fifty   
   > degree heat for three days with batteries?   
      
   Fuel cells, not new technology.   
      
   > Why is the "second round" of "returning" to the moon estimated to be   
   > no earlier than half a century after the first?   
      
   Bureaucracy.   
   Everything costs more, and more hands are in the governments pockets.   
      
   > (Would there be a fifty-year span between the first and second   
   > trips across the Atlantic in an airplane?)   
      
   How long did it take for airplanes to evolve from prop to jet propulsion?   
   How long did it take marketable cars to evolve from gasoline to use propane?   
   Hybrid electric?   
      
   > If the moon landings were, as we believe, a government deception, then   
   > George Orwell's comment, "whoever controls the past, controls the future"   
   > is a scary wakeup call to insist that our government reform to the   
   > truthfulness of our founding father "who could not tell a lie."   
      
   As who believes?   
   George's statement was correct, just look at the history of wars.   
      
   > Otherwise, the powers that be (The Zionist Network) will continue their   
   > addiction to deception and we all will be worse off for it.   
      
   Better watch out, comments like that will lead the 4th reich to stalk you.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)