XPost: alt.conspiracy, fr.soc.complots, soc.culture.usa   
   From: BogusID@YesItIs.com   
      
   "BradGuth"  wrote in message   
   news:1180469733.729121.314960@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com...   
   > On May 29, 12:32 pm, "BogusID"  wrote:   
   >> "BradGuth"  wrote in message   
   >>   
   >> news:1180464249.168405.89790@o11g2000prd.googlegroups.com...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> >> There's enough proof for me to easily believe man went to the moon,   
   >> >> and   
   >> >> no   
   >> >> conclusive proof for me to believe we didn't.   
   >>   
   >> > Then obviously you and others of your silly kind don't believe in the   
   >> > regular laws of physics, but you'll accept hocus-pocus infomercial   
   >> > crapolla any day of the week.  Now I understand your pathetic faith-   
   >> > based mindset of naysayism and of such total denial of being in   
   >> > denial.   
   >>   
   >> NAYSAYISM -  aren't YOU the one saying NAY we didn't go there?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> >> What do you have, some pictures that show double shadows from   
   >> >> different   
   >> >> light source directions?   
   >>   
   >> > Others have that to go with, whereas I've got Venus situated above   
   >> > that physically dark horizon, and a few other pesky Kodak worthy   
   >> > moments, plus a spare load of rocket science that still doesn't add   
   >> > up.   
   >>   
   >> Do you have a link to share, or is that part of your personal collection?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> >> Double shadowing happens here when the moon is full at night tool,   
   >> >> consider   
   >> >> the Earth might reflect more sunlight than the moon does.   
   >>   
   >> > You are a double shadowing liar, or that of something far worse, arnt   
   >> > you.   
   >>   
   >> Honestly, you should ask you parents to let you stay out after dark when   
   >> a   
   >> full moon is out.   
   >> You will see moon shadows, and secondary shadows form street lighting.   
   >>   
   >> If you care to actually engage in a conversation instead of acting like a   
   >> defensive religious nut, great.   
   >   
   > Unlike yourself, I use the regular laws of physics, and of the best   
   > available science that's replicated.   
   >   
   > Unlike yourself, I also don't happen to like and otherwise suck up to   
   > those bad guys.   
   >   
   > I also don't modify the original topic crosspostings unless there's no   
   > other option.   
   > -   
   > Brad Guth   
   > -   
   > "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell   
   >   
      
      
   Deflection...Duh, der, doh.   
   What's it like being the only one techered to the laws of physics with your   
   feet on the ground?   
      
   Do you have any cites  to support your position?   
      
   Deflection...Duh, der, doh.   
   Suck up to "the bad guys"?   
   Hey where is that image link anyways?   
      
   Do you have any cites  to support your position?   
      
   Deflection...Duh, der, doh.   
   I reduced the group list to a more relevant readership.   
   Do you have a politically oriented French email girlfriend out there or   
   what?   
      
   Yeah ok, lets just share this with all the folks you are trying to impress   
   even though its irrelevant to them.   
      
   The group alt.fr.politique.fiction is not even vlaid on my news server!   
      
   Deflection...Duh, der, doh.   
      
   You should read the thread again, and try responding on topic before   
   everyone adds you to their killfiles...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)