XPost: rec.aviation.military   
   From: lumpy@digitalcartography.com   
      
   miso@sushi.com wrote:   
      
   > I don't think you would shoot "up" a hill.  sounds like a prescription   
   > for blow-back.   
   >   
   > I think there are targets on the screens, but it is just at the limits   
   > of resolution. Note that the ground approaching the targets has been   
   > "grubbed." Also note that to the left of the targets is a similar area   
   > of ground that has been grubbed, but there are no targets. This could   
   > be an area used for the same unknown purpose, but with the targets now   
   > removed.   
   >   
   > To the right of the targets is what appears to be more targets, but   
   > not bright, nor is the ground grubbed.   
      
   Post the approx coord's. Let's all have a guess.   
      
   I'm interested in the angle of the face of the targets.   
   They don't sit square to the buildings at the base of   
   the hill. They face airborne shooters.   
      
   Is that a tank truck at the base of the hill?   
      
   Could it be a "selective shoot/no shoot" area.   
   Hit the targets but don't hit the "buildings".   
   The three identical "buildings" look like they   
   could be containers rather than trailers or bldgs.   
      
   Are the poles power lines or something else? Real or dummy?   
      
      
   Lumpy - The Anti Yanni   
      
   www.digitalcartography.com/GILumpyDesertCamo.jpg   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)