From: lumpy@digitalcartography.com   
      
   miso@sushi.com wrote:   
   > As I pointed out in the previous paragraph, I am doing things   
   > scientifically. We know there is a microwave relay at Point Bravo. You   
   > think you know how to find such relays. So go find it. I simply don't   
   > understand your attitude.   
      
   All I said was that the sat photo the OP asked about   
   looks to me like a radome and it's pointed 270 west.   
   You're the one that's asking me to point out any   
   other uwave's with radomes. I've done that. You,   
   in typical fashion, haven't commented on that.   
   You're hung up on the freakin Bravo question.   
   I don't give a flip what's at Bravo. The answer   
   to that has nothing to do with the orig question   
   and why that antenna can't have a radome.   
      
   Lump:   
   > > But your posting things here, disguised as   
   > > a question, when you really don't want an   
   > > answer is historically repetitive.   
      
   Miso:   
   > No, I want an answer.   
      
   Bullshit. You post here because you want to archive   
   your comments. Any time you appear to ask a question,   
   if someone gives an answer, you argue that they are   
   wrong and you already know the answer and/or you   
   attempt to steer the topic elsewhere.   
      
   I don't know what the deal with you and Joerg and   
   Georg Knapp is. I'm not sure who's photo of the   
   new hanger that is. My guess is that you told George   
   you discovered it first, and Joerg claims he discovered   
   it first. I think only two people know the answer to   
   that question.   
      
   Look Miso, you're a world class air spotter and researcher.   
   You kind of drop the ball in the ethics dept when it comes   
   to some of the stuff you allow on ATS. And you're not   
   doing the research community any good by fighting with DLR.   
   DLR has the other 51 cards in the deck. Some a lot older   
   and more worn than you. If you want to alienate yourself   
   from the rest of the researchers, that's your deal. But   
   you're sure not doing the community any good by posting   
   to ATS and to the only two goofballs on this newsgroup   
   that care, me and krack. DLR just comissioned a 1 meter   
   sat photo of the base. You're wasting your time challenging   
   me to "find the antenna" at Bravo.   
      
   Now...Got any new research? Real research, like you're   
   famous for doing. New photos? What are the teeny boppers   
   on ATS thinking these days? What have you done lately to help   
   convince even one of them that doing clean and honest   
   scientific research is a good thing. Those kiddie wankers   
   are tomorrow's leaders. It would be a good thing indeed if   
   some experienced, more mature voice would help them, maybe   
   just one of them, to develop a scientific approach to   
   their questioning, instead of their "dude, I'm sure they   
   have grays at Area 51 and they're hearding people into   
   railroad cars to be taken there and fed to the aliens."   
      
      
   Lumpy   
      
   In Your Ears for 40 Years   
    www.lumpymusic.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)