home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.area51      That little magical place in the desert      2,359 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,158 of 2,359   
   emoneyjoe to miso@sushi.com   
   Re: T.D. Barne's comments on AREA 51 boo   
   06 Jun 11 00:07:52   
   
   7ace7f8e   
   From: emoneyjoe@iglou.com   
      
   On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 20:44:12 -0700 (PDT), "miso@sushi.com"   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Jun 5, 5:56 am, emoneyjoe  wrote:   
   >> On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:20:59 -0700 (PDT), "m...@sushi.com"   
   >>   
   >>  wrote:   
   >> >On Jun 4, 1:43 pm, emoneyjoe  wrote:   
   >> >> On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:29:54 -0700 (PDT), "m...@sushi.com"   
   >>   
   >> >>  wrote:   
   >> >> >On Jun 3, 5:33 pm, emoneyjoe  wrote:   
   >> >> >> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:41:32 -0700, "Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke"   
   >>   
   >> >> >>  wrote:   
   >> >> >> >emoneyjoe wrote:   
   >> >> >> >>            I think all the stories   
   >> >> >> >> of fallout over area51 somehow got   
   >> >> >> >> exaggerated into bomb stories.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >Point, obviously, is that there weren't 100 nukes   
   >> >> >> >anywhere. And zero at area 51.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >Great investigative reporting.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >Notwithstanding the bit about how the base, apparently   
   >> >> >> >operating in 1947, received Russian juvenile spacecraft   
   >> >> >> >pilots.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >"Information never before made public before my book"   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >Lump   
   >>   
   >> >> >>           It is easy to see the book author was a _little_   
   >> >> >> clueless, but I don't know what you mean by not   
   >> >> >> 100 nukes.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>          Are you separating the atomic from the nuclear,   
   >> >> >> wiki says there was well over 1,000 all together, but   
   >> >> >> apparently many if not most were underground (or   
   >> >> >> in the Pacific, and one or more in space).   
   >>   
   >> >> >>          I visited my Aunt in North Las Vegas in 1963 and   
   >> >> >> her husband drove up the highway every morning,   
   >> >> >> I knew he was a tunnel man, and no telling which way   
   >> >> >> or how far the tunnels went or how deep they were.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>          I worked in a foundry in 1954 making compressor   
   >> >> >> blades with screw thread shanks in a building payed for   
   >> >> >> by the AEC, the blades were for a rather large turbine   
   >> >> >> compressor for that era, and there was some talk of   
   >> >> >> an atomic powered airplane, but we didn't have any   
   >> >> >> blueprints or plans of the engine, just a section of   
   >> >> >> both the rotor and stator to see if the blades fit   
   >> >> >> properly.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>         I don't remember what year, but I new an   
   >> >> >> engineer at NASA that said he was working   
   >> >> >> running a jet engine in a wind tunnel that produced   
   >> >> >> way over 100 decibels and his ears were bothering him.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>         I have wondered if the compressor was for an   
   >> >> >> airplane or just an air mover for ventilating a tunnel   
   >> >> >> or building.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>          The Ben Rich book says that Kelly Johnson   
   >> >> >> had a pilot look for a place to test the U-2 in 1954,   
   >> >> >> and there was nothing at the dry lake then, but   
   >> >> >> the government built a hanger and runway in   
   >> >> >> a short time to start flight testing in 1955, but   
   >> >> >> the book is so self inconsistent I have no faith   
   >> >> >> in any of the dates.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>          I recently saw images of a model of the   
   >> >> >> SR-71/A-12 being tested on a radar test range   
   >> >> >> and the caption said area51 in the 1950s, but   
   >> >> >> there was no model of either until late in 1959,   
   >> >> >> and Ben Rich said Lockheed had no radar   
   >> >> >> range even by 1980.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>          Either there is intentional misinformation   
   >> >> >> or really bad memory by some.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>           I can document that I invented stealth   
   >> >> >> shapes in the 1975-1976 time frame and   
   >> >> >> wrote about the way to implement it in May   
   >> >> >> of 1977, but Russian engineers or mis-figured   
   >> >> >> children pilots  had nothing to do with it.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>          In 1947 Russia had nothing that could have   
   >> >> >> placed any kind of craft in New Mexico airspace.   
   >>   
   >> >> >>          Books are written to sell, but some authors   
   >> >> >> seem to think BS sells better than facts.   
   >>   
   >> >> >The nuclear powered plane was Project Pluto. I met a machinist who   
   >> >> >worked on the project.   
   >>   
   >> >>           It was a bad idea to begin with because the power required   
   >> >> is so great, a B-50 with four R-4360s is equivalent to at least   
   >> >> 12,000 horsepower or 10 megawatts and the new big 2-engine   
   >> >> airliners are ten times that.   
   >>   
   >> >>           I think the reactor tested in a B-36 was less than   
   >> >> 5 megawatts, sounds like a lot, but nowhere near enough.   
   >>   
   >> >> >The F117A IIRC was based on Russian documents. It was in Ben Rich's   
   >> >> >book.   
   >>   
   >> >>           Maybe, but the number of self-inconsistencies makes   
   >> >> me wonder, I suspect that when the competition between   
   >> >> the 5 or 6 companies was going on, Lockheed was using   
   >> >> the model of the A-12/SR-71, and at some point in 1976   
   >> >> or 1977 went to the flat surfaces.   
   >>   
   >> >>          My name is the last reference on the list of patents   
   >> >> on the second page of the reissue patent, if there would   
   >> >> not have been security involved I think Lockheed would   
   >> >> have been forced to negotiate splitting royalties with me   
   >> >> because I mailed in a patent application on flat surfaces   
   >> >> more than a month before the Air Force hand-carried   
   >> >> their patent application to the patent office.   
   >>   
   >> >>          There is some issue with "first to file" and "first to   
   >> >> invent", and I intentionally did not put the details of   
   >> >> my invention on paper in December of 1978, I felt   
   >> >> what I wrote in May of 1977 in the Space Act of 1958   
   >> >> requirement that went to NASA was all that was needed   
   >> >> to know to first implement the technology.   
   >>   
   >> >>          I don't know if the image file of that paper made   
   >> >> it on all servers, it was on my server, but I don't suscribe   
   >> >> to Giganews anymore, I can't afford it.   
   >>   
   >> >>          If you have the Ben Rich book I can point out   
   >> >> the inconsistencies, I have more faith in the crash   
   >> >> dates of the two Have Blue articles than in the other   
   >> >> text.   
   >>   
   >> >>          I can't think of any reason for errors in dates   
   >> >> more than 30 years ago other than trying to hide   
   >> >> something, but I have no idea what it could be.   
   >>   
   >> >>          At least Ben Rich didn't claim they got the   
   >> >> technology from aliens. :-)   
   >>   
   >> >> Ken Fischer   
   >>   
   >> >I have Ben Rich's book in hardcover and softback. I've been collecting   
   >> >soft cover copies of his book and a few similar books to put in   
   >> >geocachces around the range.   
   >>   
   >>          I wonder if there is local news coverage that gave the   
   >> date of the two Have Blue planes, the notes by Bill Park in   
   >> the Ben Rich book give the dates as May 4, 1978 and   
   >> July, 1979.   
   >>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca