From: stealthman@iglou.com   
      
   On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 04:17:40 -0400, STEALTHMAN    
   wrote:   
      
   >01   This invention relates to a concept of electronic   
   >        avoidance and the   
   >02   exact exterior physical configurations of the craft   
   >        or objects that   
   >03   would best be invisible to radar or other means   
   >        of electronic   
   >04   detection.    Although this concept is effective   
   >        when utilized  in   
   >05   the design of any craft, object, or body, no claims   
   >        are mare or   
   >06   infered  in this application for any objects or bodies   
   >       other than   
   >07   aircraft or spacecraft.   
   >   
   >                                    (6)   
      
   08  Conception took place during preparation and shortly   
          after application   
   09  which resulted in United States Patent Number 4066226,   
          which, when   
   10  constructed as envisioned by the inventor, results in   
          an aircraft   
   11  or spacecraft which is, without any modification,   
          extremely effective   
   12  in avoiding electronic detection, so much so, that it   
         would be a very   
   13  considerable danger  to allow it to operate  in   
         controlled airspace.   
   14  The basic concept of the system simply deduces   
          that if all reflected   
   15  electromagnetic radiation is focused or directed   
          into as small a   
   16  return beam as possible, it would be extremely   
          likely that that beam   
   17  would be reflected in a direction other than back   
         to the receiving   
   18  antenna of the detection system.    Claims will be   
          confined to specifics   
   19  furnished to the United States in paper No. 11,   
          U. S. Patent Number   
   20  4066226 , Airfoil, Reduced Profile, 'Y' Flow, hybrid,   
          and to refined   
   21   theoretical  configurations which while more effective,   
          might not be   
   22  practical or economical to construct, and also to   
          configurations   
   23  which were not mentioned but which might not be   
          know in the present   
   24  state of the art but which complete all of the possible   
          configurations   
   25  which are effective in electronic avoidance.   
      
                (end of page 1 of application 05/972527)   
      
         Note:   By this time the application cover sheet   
   had been marked "DO NOT SEND TO ISSUE,   
   First to Licensing an d Review   DOE   
          Part of the line after "ISSUE" is blacked out,   
   and part missing or whited out.   
      
      
           Page Two, Application 972527 - Continued   
      
   01  This concept is more effective when the radar is   
          the type normally   
   02  used as combat radar.     Larger radar such as   
          used for some space   
   03  projects, might or might not be effective in   
         detecting some or all   
   04  of the mentioned configurations.   
      
   05  Considering the simplicity of the concept, after   
         conception, prior art   
   06  seemed a certainty, but then again, the massive   
          losses in Vietnam   
   07  and the loss of life and suffering in imprisonment   
          of fine American   
   08  men during the conflict and in the bombing of   
         Hanoi in December of   
   09  1972, suggests that the state of the art was not   
          too advanced.   
   10  It is the primary object of this invention to provide   
          a simple but   
   11  effective means to construct vehicles, craft, vessels,   
         aircraft,   
   12  spacecraft, rockets, re-entry vehicles, and other   
         land craft and   
   13  objects in such a manner that they will be nearly   
         or completely   
   14  invisible to radar or other means of electronic   
         detection.   
   15  It's use is meant to be exclusively military in nature   
         and has no   
   16  purpose in public, commercial or civilian activities   
         of any kind.   
   17  There are no further objects of this invention.   
      
      
         Note:   By this time, after one or two office actions,   
   the Washington patent attorney had read the application   
   and when I called him, he said, "this is pretty important   
   art you have", and I was hesitant in saying anything   
   technical about the invention over the phone, and   
   then he said, "just what is it you want to protect?".   
          That floored me, and I wondered how I could   
   have written 3 or 4 pages in the specification and   
   he didn't know what I wanted to protect.   
         He then asked if I could come to Washington   
   to discuss the modifications to the specification,   
   and I said I would have to think about it.   
      
         I was short of money, had a job, had two kids   
   in college, and did not feel like making a trip, and   
   feared running up a bill with the law firm and the   
   possibility that I would have had to give them   
   part of the invention if I couldn't pay the bill, so   
   I began thinking of how to file a "continuation-in-   
   part application, rather than try to salvage the   
   apparently less than adequate application 972527.   
      
                           (7)   
      
   STEALTHMAN   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)