XPost: alt.conspiracy.america-at-war, alt.terrorism.world-trade-center   
   From: paul_richard@comcast.net   
      
   If you contend that the way we saw WTC7 fall neatly and symmetrically in its   
   footprint was the result of some quick and dirty "just dropping" it   
   (something that could be rigged in only a few hours," then all the elaborate   
   rigging for most controlled demolitions that take place must just not be   
   necessary.  Whoever did the quick rigging for just dropping it should patent   
   their approach.   
      
   What was the difference, in your opinion, between the results of "quick   
   dropping" vs. "controlled demolition."  It looked the same to most   
   observers.   
      
      
   "Larry W. Twonky"  wrote in message   
   news:d9mh6a$aeg$1@mailhub227.itcs.purdue.edu...   
   >" if it takes weeks at least to rig a building for controlled demolition?"   
   >   
   > The key is "controlled".  You can bring a building down pretty quick if   
   > you just want to drop it, as was proved that day.   
   >   
   > Twonky, because I can.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)