XPost: alt.conspiracy.america-at-war, alt.conspiracy.lady-di, cis.talk   
   XPost: alt.terrorism.world-trade-center   
   From: paul_richard@comcast.net   
      
    wrote in message   
   news:1120365464.490465.110920@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...   
   > Lots of things "go boom" during a fire. How many things have you bought   
   > that indicate "do not exceed blah blah blah temperature."  CRTs   
   > implode. Pull can mean pull the crew.   
      
   No, pull does not mean that, in the context Silverstein and the industry   
   uses it.   
      
   True, many things go boom during a fire.  Less frequently, however, are   
   professional firefighters describing a sequence of top down   
   "detonation-like" booms.   
      
   > You are going at it from the wrong direction. You need to find physical   
   > evidence that proves a bomb or series of bombs went off.  Eye witnesses   
   > are generally well intentioned, but generally not all that trustworthy.   
   > Physical evidence is much more trustworthy.   
      
   Where shall we look for that evidence?  In the rubble that was shipped off   
   illegally from the crime scene before it could be inspected.  Objective   
   thinkers see this as part of the conspiracy.  The fact that it was carted   
   away by same company that carted away rubble from Murrah building?  Ok, feel   
   free to leave this thinking to others.   
      
   > The worse conspiracy theory was that a plane didn't hit the Pentagon.   
   > If you have ever been to a plane crash, there are upteen parts with   
   > serial numbers on them. Paperwork on plane maintenance is anal   
   > retentive. You find a part, you can say what plane was there. And there   
   > are always parts. Subassemblies just fly off.   
      
   If you believe this is conspiracy, then you have to believe Bush and Co are   
   in on it either before or after the fact.  But you attribute incompetence to   
   them but not complicity.  This appears to be a major contradiction.   
      
   > As time passes, it is getting easier to blame Shrub and crew for   
   > ineptness. The latest documented screw ups of the FBI came out only   
   > because Moussaoui requested the documents and the government could no   
   > longer stonewall. When the democrats get controll of Congress, the dirt   
   > on the Bush crime family will be exposed.   
      
   The dirt is already exposed, but if you're waiting for mainstream media to   
   report it, it won't happen regardless of who controls Congress because media   
   isn't controlled by Congress.   
      
   > Incompetent? You bet. Complicit. Not likely.   
      
   You seem to like to use Bush-isms (evil doers) and Rumsfeld-isms (you bet).   
   Incompetence but not complicity.  Too much evidence, even that not carted   
   away by complicit contractors, contradicts that.  Mistakes were made...   
   Yeah right.  We can end things here.  Your position and even verbiage where   
   not contradictory (Pentagon conspiracy but nowhere else?) is too much in   
   step with admin story.  We can let readers infer what they will from our   
   exchanges here.   
      
   > You want to see the fecal matter distubed? Get Coleen Rowley elected to   
   > the house.   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)