Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 97,702 of 99,700    |
|    John Corbett to Gil Jesus    |
|    Re: Questions for the self-proclaimed "m    |
|    31 Oct 23 06:01:56    |
      From: geowright1963@gmail.com              On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 4:59:29 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:       > On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 12:25:50 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:        > > But after 60 years you still can't match the Tippit bullets to Oswald's       gun.       > They can't even match the bullets to the shells.              Tell us how bullets can be matched to shells.               If you are talking about the makes of the shells and the bullets removed from       Tippit's body,       the WC offered a perfectly plausible explanation. Both Remmington and       Winchesters were        used in the shooting. There was a difference in the number of Remmington and       Winchesters       between the bullets and the shells. One was a 2-2 split and the other was a       3-1. It is quite       possible that Oswald fired 5 or more shots but only hit Tippit with 4. That       would mean he       discarded more than 4 shells at the scene but only 4 were found. The 4 that       were found were       not the same distribution of makes as the bullets. Perfectly plausible. The       other possibility       which I find much less likely is that Oswald reloaded a shell from one company       with a bullet       from another. That is something that is more commonly done with rifle ammo       which is a bit       more expensive and thus a greater incentive to use reloads.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca