home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.jfk      Discussing the assassination of JFK      99,700 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 97,718 of 99,700   
   Bud to Gil Jesus   
   Re: Questions for the self-proclaimed "m   
   31 Oct 23 14:36:57   
   
   From: sirslick@fast.net   
      
   On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 5:09:10 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 3:29:45 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:    
   > > On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:50:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett    
   > >  wrote:    
   > >    
   > > >On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 6:48:54?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:    
   > > >> On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 5:12:02?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:    
   > > >>> There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel   
   compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable"   
   one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will   
   have no problem answering    
   my questions.    
   > > >>>    
   > > >>> QUESTION # 33: Why wasn't Tom Alyea, the Dallas news reporter whose   
   cameraman filmed the discovery of the rifle on the sixth floor, called before   
   the Warren Commission ?    
   > > >> The WC decided not to.    
   > > >    
   > > >According to Gil, I only answered one of his 37 questions correctly and   
   it wasn't this one. So why does Gil think this answer is wrong?    
   > > Why can't you cite for this claimed answer? Your naked & unsupported    
   > > speculation isn't an answer.   
   > Stupid Corbett doesn't understand how my grading system works.    
      
     Who says it does?   
      
   >So here it is:    
   >    
   > 1. There is only one answer to the questions --- the correct answer. You can   
   respond ( answer ) as many times as you like, but any responses other than the   
   correct answer is considered the wrong answer and detracts from the score. For   
   example, one    
   correct answer and one comment = one correct answer out of two and a 50 %   
   score. One correct answer, one comment and one insult = one correct answer out   
   of three or a 33 % score, etc. The more comments, insults and other bullshit   
   you post, detracts from    
   any score you achieve.    
   >    
   > Comments are considered wrong answers.    
   > Insults are considered wrong answers.    
   > Answering questions with questions are considered wrong answers.    
   >    
   > This is to prevent all of the above, to encourage correct responses and   
   penalize troll-like responses.    
   >    
   > 2. ANY RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONS AFTER I'VE SCORE THEM AND POSTED THE   
   RESULTS WILL NOT BE COUNTED. For example, I've scored questions 1-20 so far.   
   Those questions are CLOSED with regard to scoring and any responses to those   
   questions will not be    
   counted. I've given people 5 days to respond to the questions before I score   
   them, that's why I'm doing the scoring five questions at a time. That's plenty   
   of time to answer the question. It would not be fair to someone like Bud who   
   has worked hard to    
   achieve the failing score of 26% so far to see someone else come by and take   
   the first place award away from him.    
   >    
   > 3. I never said Corbett responded to 37 questions. I said Corbett has   
   responded 37 TIMES in the first 20 QUESTIONS and only once posted the right   
   answer. That means that according to my rules, Corbett posted 36 wrong answers   
   ( comments, insults and    
   questions ) for the first 20 questions.    
   >    
   > Since I haven't yet scored the questions past Question # 20, any correct   
   answers he may have given to those questions has yet to be tallied. I've   
   already explained this to him, but I can't seem to get that through his cement   
   head.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca