From: geowright1963@gmail.com   
      
   On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 11:54:25 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 1:13:47 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:    
   > > The trailer did not indicate who those doctors were that were discussing   
   the wounds. If that    
   > > panel discussion took place recently, none of the doctors on that panel   
   looked old enough to    
   > > have been in the ER the day of the assassination. Even a young resident in   
   his mid to late    
   > > twenties on the day of the assassination would be well into his eighties   
   by now. None of that    
   > > panel looked nearly that old which means they are forming opinions based   
   on comments made    
   > > by the ER team, not on any firsthand observations.   
   > I'm sure that they just went out and picked up some winos for a panel chat.    
   > Idiot.   
      
   The only name I recognized was Robert McClelland so the others were probably   
   on the    
   periphery. In any case, the opinions of people who only tended to JFK for a   
   matter of minutes   
   before he flatlined hardly trump those of the autopsy team that spent hours   
   examining the   
   body for the specific purpose of determining the nature of the wounds. Their   
   conclusion that   
   the shots that struck JFK from behind have been confirmed by every qualified   
   medical examiner   
   who has looked at the photos and x-rays. You can't cite on qualified forensic   
   examiner who    
   saw any medical evidence of a shot from the front or the side. They have all   
   said the medical   
   evidence indicates JFK was hit by two shots from behind.    
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)