From: gjjmail1202@gmail.com   
      
   On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 11:17:31 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:   
   > Fish Part Messiah isn't going to answer this, or at least answer it in any   
   substantive way. Fish Part is once again guilty of something called   
   presentism, which is the idea that the standards and practices of the past can   
   be judged retrospectively on    
   the standards and practices of today. It's possible that in today's world,   
   there might be records for some of the questions Fish Part brings up,   
   irrelevant as his concerns are, but not in 1963 America.    
      
   No, just like you,  I'm sure there weren't any such things in 1963 as work   
   schedules or records of assignments, like we have today.   
   No, like you, I'm sure there were no records at the USPS or REA Express on who   
   worked their counters that week between 3/20 and 3/27, like we have today.   
   No, like you, I'm sure the same FBI that was willing to fingerprint every   
   employee in the TSBD, didn't have the time to interview the employees of the   
   USPS or REA, like they would today.   
      
   When you're talking a chain of custody, it's important to know who had custody   
   of the weapons.    
   The tracking of the weapons must have been done by you, because it was done   
   half-assed.   
      
   And no employee of either establishment ever came forward to identify himself   
   as the one who gave Oswald the weapons.   
   Even after Oswald became world famous, and his face was plastered in every   
   newspaper and all over every TV set in the world, you mean to say no one   
   recognized him ?   
   No one remembered his box # 2915 ?   
   No one remembered him coming to the counter with a notice ?   
   No one remembered a 40" package ?   
      
   No one at REA Express remembered handing him a package that was noted as, "1   
   crtn pistol" ?   
      
   Why wasn't anyone from REA Express ever called to give testimony, Chuckles ?   
   Why was all the REA documentation autheticated by Heinz Michaelis, the manager   
   at Seaport Traders,    
   who wasn't even employed by them when the transaction occurred ?   
      
   Why didn't the FBI interview the employees at the USPS branch where Box 2915   
   was located ?   
   They interviewed all kinds of people who had no knowledge of the crime.   
   They interviewed a woman who knew a woman who babysat Oswald when he was 2 1/2   
   years old.   
   They interviewed Dean Rusk.   
   They accepted as an exhibit the bite pattern of Jack Ruby's mother.   
      
   They took 18 pages of testimony from the emcee at Jack Ruby's club.   
   But the guy who brought two rifles into the building that the President was   
   allegedly shot from only got two pages of testimony ?   
      
   What do all these deficiencies have to do with standards between 1963 and   
   today ? These weren't prehistoric times, this was 1963.   
   Why did they waste their time and manpower on shit that had NOTHING to do with   
   this crime, while at the same time neglecting to pursue leads and tie up loose   
   ends ?   
   Enlighten us, Chuckles.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)