Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 97,766 of 99,700    |
|    Gil Jesus to John Corbett    |
|    Re: A question for those who think the e    |
|    02 Nov 23 10:52:29    |
      From: gjjmail1202@gmail.com              On Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 1:37:19 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:       > On Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 1:07:59 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:        > > On Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 12:54:36 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:        > > > I'm asking you to explain how, if the blowout was limited to the back of       the head, brain matter could have ended up forward of JFK's position.               > > Who said the blowout was limited to the back of the head ?        > > Where TF did you get that gem from ?              > Does this mean that you agree with the autopsy finding that the defect was       chiefly parietal,        > extending somewhat into the occipital and temporal regions? If so, we are       making progress. If        > you don't agree with the autopsy finding, tell us where you think the defect       in the skull was and        > to where it extended.              Don't try to change the subject to the autopsy report.              I asked you who said that, "the blowout was limited to the back of the head" .              Will you answer that question or will you run ?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca