From: geowright1963@gmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 1:52:30 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:   
   > On Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 1:37:19 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:    
   > > On Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 1:07:59 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:    
   > > > On Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 12:54:36 PM UTC-4, John Corbett   
   wrote:    
   > > > > I'm asking you to explain how, if the blowout was limited to the back   
   of the head, brain matter could have ended up forward of JFK's position.    
   >    
   > > > Who said the blowout was limited to the back of the head ?    
   > > > Where TF did you get that gem from ?    
   >    
   > > Does this mean that you agree with the autopsy finding that the defect was   
   chiefly parietal,    
   > > extending somewhat into the occipital and temporal regions? If so, we are   
   making progress. If    
   > > you don't agree with the autopsy finding, tell us where you think the   
   defect in the skull was and    
   > > to where it extended.   
   > Don't try to change the subject to the autopsy report.    
      
   The subject is where did the bullet strike JFK's head and which direction did   
   it come from. Why   
   is it you always want to disregard the evidence that is contrary to the   
   narrative you are pushing?   
   >    
   > I asked you who said that, "the blowout was limited to the back of the head"   
   .    
   >    
   > Will you answer that question or will you run ?   
      
   You refuse to say what you believe happened. When you ask, "Who said the   
   blowout was limited   
   to the back of the head ?". Most people would take that to mean you don't   
   believe the blowout   
   was limited to the back of the head. But now you are dancing back and forth.   
   This is the kind of   
   game playing Ben Holmes has engaged in for as long as I have participated in   
   this forum. He    
   seems to take one position and when challenged on it, he denies he took such a   
   position. Why   
   don't you just clarify what YOU believe regarding the blowout wound in the   
   skull. Tell us where   
   YOU believe it was and where it extended to. If you aren't willing to take a   
   position on that    
   critical issue, what is the point in anybody listening to what you have to say   
   on the subject?   
   Do you have a point to make or, like Holmes, you are just here to play silly   
   games. Your answer   
   will give us an indication as to which is the case.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)