From: brockgeorge26@gmail.com   
      
   On Friday, November 3, 2023 at 9:57:18 AM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:   
   > On Friday, November 3, 2023 at 6:25:53 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:    
   > > On Friday, November 3, 2023 at 6:29:30 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:    
   > > > Only the authorities after the commission of a crime, stupid.    
   > > >    
   > > > Do you think the need to track the Carcano Oswald killed Kennedy with   
   back to the soldier who carried it in WWII?    
   >    
   > > You haven't proven Oswald received the rifle, stupid.   
   > I'll bet Mrs. Kennedy would've disagreed with that.    
   >    
   > Eyewitnesses, photos of Oswald with the rifle, shipping receipts, ballistic   
   evidence, etc. all prove Oswald received the rifle and fired it, killing JFK   
   and wounding JBC.    
   >    
   > It's called consilience in the evidence. Different types of evidence from   
   different sources converging on an inescapable conclusion that your hero   
   Oswald was the assassin, fanboy.    
   >    
   > That it hasn't been proven to YOUR particular standard is an entirely   
   different matter.   
      
   Something people often miss---simple as it is--- that something can be true   
   quite apart from evidence that satisfies *them*.  The problem may be the lack   
   of evidence, or simply their own inability to correctly understand what   
   evidence really is, and what    
   it most readily suggests.  ...Indeed the evidence question may be wholly   
   inadequate to demonstrate all truth.  There may be, in fact, little green men   
   "out there somewhere" even if we don't have any real evidence of them.    
   However, without solid evidence,   
    it will be up to the individual how much--if any--stock to put in such a   
   notion.   
      
   What Gil fails to understand, is that in this case it is the *conspiracy* side   
   that has the same available evidence we have of little green men, whereas our   
   side has things such as you cite above and a whole lot more.  I suggest that   
   the failure here    
   lies in the inability of the CT side to *correctly* parse the available   
   evidence.  Because as Bud says they are always  "Looking at the wrong things,   
   wrongly!"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)