From: willisdonald824@gmail.com   
      
   On Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 11:20:18 PM UTC-7, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:   
   > On Friday, November 3, 2023 at 1:32:26 AM UTC-4, Donald Willis wrote:    
   > > 1:22pm DPD radio message translates as The Jacket Was Planted, Folks--and   
   that ain't all    
   > >    
   > > First faint clue: DPD Sgt. G.D. Henslee transcribes the first line of the   
   transmission thusly: "Have a description of the suspect on Jefferson."   
   Actually, the transmission runs, "We have a description on this suspect over   
   here on Jefferson." The    
   omitted "over here" makes it sound like the sender, Officer Roy Walker, is   
   actually on Jefferson. Is there a problem with that? Oh, yes.    
   > >    
   > > Second faint clue: But, first, continuing the text of the 1:22   
   transmission: "Last seen about 300 E. Jefferson. He's a white male, about 30,   
   5'8", black hair, slender, wearing a white jacket, white shirt, and dark   
   slacks". (DPD radio logs) Dale Myers    
   tinkers with the description: "Last seen about 300 block of East Jefferson."   
   ("With Malice" p114) Note that he adds "block of", making it sound as if   
   Walker is simply indicating a block. But Walker specified an address, 300, at   
   Jefferson & Beckley, a    
   full block west of the site where the jacket was found, at Jefferson &   
   Crawford. And if it be thought that dictabelt skips account for the missing   
   words, see below for follow-ups on Myers and Walker. And note that the   
   dispatcher, at 1:26, has the suspect    
   "going west on Jefferson from the 300 block". (CE 705 p22)    
   > >    
   > > Third faint clue: At 1:19:05, the dispatcher tells Walker to check out 501   
   E. 10th at Denver (WMp105). Then, at 1:19:59, he tells Walker "The suspect's   
   running west on Jefferson from the location" (DPD radio logs/WMp109). When, at   
   1:21:37, Walker    
   radios "I haven't seen anything on Jefferson yet" (DPD radio logs), the   
   dispatcher again directs him to "501 E. 10th at Denver" (CE 705p20/WM p113).   
   Finally, at 1:22:36, Walker radios his "over here" description. From his   
   1:21:37 transmission, we know    
   that Walker was, at the time, on Jefferson. But we don't know, from his radio   
   transmissions, whether he was ever at 10th & Patton. He doesn't correct or   
   follow-up the dispatcher's "10th at Denver", after either of the latter's   
   advisories.    
   > >    
   > > Fourth (getting somewhere) clue: And yet Myers insists that Walker met and   
   talked to Warren Reynolds at the murder scene: "Reynolds returned to 10th &   
   Patton at about [1:20], despite Reynolds' testimony to the contrary" (p112).   
   True, in 1983, Walker    
   told Myers that he did meet Reynolds, about 1:22. However, he adds, "One of   
   the used car lot operators saw the incident... Warren Reynolds" (p114). The   
   latter never said that he saw the shooting--Walker's memory fails him here.    
   > >    
   > > And Reynolds would hardly have been the one to tell Walker, "Last seen   
   about 300 E. Jefferson". Ruinously for him, Walker told Myers that it was   
   "Reynolds [who] gave me the description of the gunman" (p114). Walker was   
   apparently unaware that TV film    
   footage has turned up showing Reynolds telling police at the scene that he   
   last saw a suspicious man going into the back of an old house near the Texaco   
   station (WM p131). Reynolds, then, could not have been Walker's "300 E.   
   Jefferson" witness, a full    
   block west of the house. (Reynolds' suspicious man may not have been the   
   gunman at all, but a vigilante trailing the gunman.) Myers, then, with one   
   hand, was simply extending Walker's witness-identity deception, despite his   
   own text and frame grabs which,   
    with the other hand, expose said deception! Myers giveth and Myers taketh   
   away.    
   > >    
   > > Fifth (gathering steam) clue: Myers then buttresses the invented   
   Walker/Reynolds confab with yet another out-of-thin-air incident, based on the   
   word of... no one at all: "Warren Reynolds, who had come with [Sgt. Bud Owens   
   & Assistant DA Bill    
   Alexander] from 10th & Patton, pointed to an old house near the Texaco   
   station..." (p120) Alexander did not testify to the Warren Commission, and   
   Owens, in his Commission testimony, did not mention bringing along a witness   
   to the Texaco area. None of the    
   principals, then--Reynolds, Walker, Alexander, Owens--can support Myers'   
   vignettes re Reynolds "returning" to and leaving the scene of the crime circa   
   1:20 and 1:22. Thin air.    
   > >    
   > > Sixth (Eureka!) clue: Relocation, relocation, relocation. Why would Walker   
   and Myers go to so much trouble to falsely identify and relocate a witness?   
   Well, what other witness or witnesses were "over here on Jefferson"?   
   Yes--Robert and Mary Brock, in    
   effect the gatekeepers of the parking-lot suspect. In fact, the Brocks were   
   the only witnesses who stated that they "last observed [the suspect] in the   
   parking lot directly behind" the service station. (WM p551) In fact, they may   
   have been the last    
   witnesses to have reported seeing the suspect, but not in the parking lot, and   
   certainly not doffing his jacket. Because at 1:22, he was reported at "about   
   300 E. Jefferson", a block further west, still wearing his "white jacket".   
   Certainly worth Walker'   
   s false identification of his witness, and Myers' subsequent, false relocation   
   of him elsewhere. Two wrongs and no right.    
   > >    
   > > And the first transmissions re the Texaco location were "Suspect just   
   passed 401 E. Jefferson" and "Subject just passed 401 E. Jefferson" (CE   
   705pp20-21)    
   > >    
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)