From: hsienzant@aol.com   
      
   On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 12:27:00 AM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:   
   > On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 10:07:43 PM UTC-4, Hank Sienzant wrote:    
   > > On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 11:46:44 PM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here   
   wrote:    
   > > > On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 11:12:25 PM UTC-4, Hank Sienzant wrote:    
   > > > > On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 4:48:20 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:    
   > > > > > There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel   
   compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable"   
   one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will   
   have no problem answering    
   my questions.    
   > > > > >    
   > > > > > The Warren Commission concluded that three shots were fired, all   
   from the Texas School Book Depository. It further concluded that one shot    
   > > > > > hit both President Kennedy and Governor Connally, one shot missed   
   the limousine completely and one shot hit President Kennedy in the head.    
   > > > > >    
   > > > > > QUESTION # 27: How many witnesses described the shooting as having   
   happened that way ?    
   > > > > None. But why would you expect them to? The entire shooting sequence   
   happened in nine seconds or less, and involved two shooting victims in a   
   moving car traveling over ten miles an hour. I remind you that some witnesses   
   thought only two shots    
   were fired, others named three, four, five or more. The witnesses were all   
   over the map on not only the number of shots, but the timing and spacing of   
   the shots as well as the source of the shots.    
   > > > Some witnesses even thought that the car stopped. Those wacky humans!    
   > > Yep. Some thought there was one shot, others heard two, others heard three   
   (the vast majority), still others said they heard four or more. They also   
   disagreed on the spacing of the shots, some of those who thought there were   
   three shots thought the    
   first two were bunched, others said the last two were closer together. And   
   some witnesses thought the shooter was in the TSBD, others named other   
   sources, including the overpass in front of the President.    
   > >    
   > > Yeah, witnesses are unreliable, which is why any investigation —   
   including this one — is guided by the hard evidence. Not the witnesses you   
   like.   
   > To Nutters, witnesses are unreliable until they confirm wacky Nutter   
   Theories.   
      
   No, not what I said. Nor is it true. All witnesses are unreliable. We only   
   know which witnesses were correct in certain claims concerning the   
   assassination proper because the hard evidence confirms their claims. That’s   
   the proper way to assess    
   eyewitnesses. Conspiracy addicts turns this upside down. They first find   
   specious reasons to discard the hard evidence (see anything written by Gil,   
   among others) and then selectively quote from the witnesses to support a   
   theory they decided upon earlier.   
       
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)