Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 97,821 of 99,700    |
|    recipient.x@gmail.com to recip...@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Nutters: where are the DPD chain of     |
|    04 Nov 23 07:06:47    |
      From: recip...@gmail.com              On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 9:55:22 PM UTC-5, recip...@gmail.com wrote:       > On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 6:18:25 PM UTC-5, recip...@gmail.com wrote:        > > On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 7:18:42 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:        > > > For the CE 139 rifle ?        > > > For the .38 handgun ?        > > > For the three spent shells found on the sixth floor ?        > > > For the four spent shells found at the Tippit murder scene ?        > > > For Oswald's jacket ?        > > > For CE 399 ?        > > > For the Walker bullet ?        > > > For the "backyard photographs" ?        > > >        > > > I'm giving you the opportunity to prove that there is no problem with       the chain of custody with any of the above evidence, by providing the       documented chain of custody forms that should have been filled out.        > > Did DPD "Chain of custody forms" exist in the first place? If so, to what       extent would they have been used?       > So, Gil is out at the EduForum begging for those, uh, forms....        >        > https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/29748-does-anyone-hav       -copies-of-the-dpd-chain-of-custody-forms/              So, Gil, did anyone at the EF respond at all about those, uh, "forms?"              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca