Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.jfk    |    Discussing the assassination of JFK    |    99,700 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 97,837 of 99,700    |
|    Bud to Gil Jesus    |
|    Re: Questions for the self-proclaimed "m    |
|    05 Nov 23 02:28:10    |
      From: sirslick@fast.net              On Sunday, November 5, 2023 at 4:50:09 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:       > On Saturday, November 4, 2023 at 8:54:50 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com       wrote:        > >       > > That is, the "secret U-2 work" consisted of making little name tags and       handing them back to the Army.        > >        > > And you think that this is somehow super-sensitive?       > During the Cuban Missile Crisis, ALL government work involving Cuba was       super-sensitive, as was work involving America's enemies Russia and China,       moron.        > Of course, in your world, name tags of landmarks or cities that the US might       target in the event of an attack would not be considered super-sensitive.        > How much do you think Castro would pay to know what those nametags said ?                Your assumptions and speculations aren`t evidence. Your source said this....               "It received long lists of names of cities in the Soviet Union, China and       Cuba which were typeset and then returned to the Army Map Service, where they       were affixed to maps."               That`s it, just the names of cities, names that probably could be found on       any over the counter purchased map.               Your speculation that they were targeted locations is just that, speculation.              > Apparently, the US Army Map Service thought the work was sensitve, they       created the standard for security that JCS didn't follow.                You assume any work done for Army Map Services was confidential.              > Apparently, the JCS employees that Epstein interviewed and the bosses at JCS       thought so, too.        > What's deemed sensitive doesn't go by YOUR standards, it goes by the       standards of the government.        > If you have a problem with that, take it up with them.                You haven`t shown there was a problem.               > MR JENNER. Does Jaggers-Childs-Stovall do any highly secret work of any       character or highly confidential work ?        > MR GRAEF. Yes, Yes; we do some work for, I think, the Army Map Service.        >        > They apparently thought the work was so super-senstiive that the supervisor       and the company owner lied to the Warren Commission about Oswald's access to       it.        >        > MR JENNER. Would he have had any contact with that ?        > MR GRAEF No.        > ( 1 H 191 )                What he doesn`t say is that *all* the work done for Army Map Services was       confidential.               > MR JENNER. So anything that is classified is done only by employees of yours       who have been cleared by a Federal agency ?        > MR STOVALL. Yes, sir.        > MR JENNER. And then, I gather that as far as Lee Harvey Oswald is concerned,       he had no part in it NOR ACCESS TO ANY OF THIS WORK ?        > MR STOVALL. THIS IS CORRECT.       > ( 10 H 169 )               You assume what Oswald worked on was confidential. He may have just been       working on the sheets the labels would be printed on.              > Oswald timesheets proved they lied.               You haven`t shown that.              > Oswald and everyone in that building had access to that work.               Just a rumor.              > Epstein corroborated those timesheets and the CIA withheld that information       from both the Warren Commission and the HSCA. And the bosses at JCS lied to       the Commission because they were afraid if the government found out their       security was below its        requirements, they'd lose their government contracts.               Crackpot speculation.              > > You're even dumber than I thought.       > You see a "K" where there is no K and you're calling me dumb ?        > ROFLMAO        >        > Congratulations. You're as much a dumbfuck as Bud and Corbett.        >        > In other words.....YOU LOSE.               You`re as delusional as Ben.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca