From: Troppocrat@aol.com   
      
   On Sunday, November 5, 2023 at 3:36:52 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:   
   > On Saturday, November 4, 2023 at 4:14:12 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:    
   > > On Saturday, November 4, 2023 at 12:16:43 PM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here   
   wrote:    
      
      
      
      
   > Don't be silly. Of course the shadow is an alteration. But Ford has the   
   wrong explanation for why it's there. You silly goose.   
      
      
   The shadow is not an alteration...That's just you trolling...   
      
   As I already explained, and you gave no answer to, Ford himself showed   
   Mytton's contrast enhancement of the Wiegman frame with the shadow and you   
   could see Lovelady's plaid right side appear in that enhancement...If you were   
   paying attention to what Ford    
   wrote he said that the shadow was impossible and was painted-in...If that were   
   true on a technical basis then Mytton would not have been able to bring out   
   any plaid right side in that image...The fact that Mytton could bring out   
   Lovelady's plaid right    
   side tells you, on a technical basis, that the image is real and is not   
   altered...That Lovelady's plaid right side is there and is hidden by   
   shadow...Therefore Ford refuted himself, but, being the crazy Duncan MacRae   
   troll that he is, he ignored it and    
   kept going anyway knowing that the dopes on the Education Forum would never   
   challenge him...   
      
   Both you and Ford also ignored the fact that the first Wiegman frame shows the   
   exact scene in Altgens 6 from a 90 degree perspective...You can see in that   
   first Wiegman frame that the only two people not seen in Altgens are Frazier   
   and Prayer Man...If    
   Ford's imaginary, Cinque-like Oswald were out on the front step landing   
   platform like Ford is trolling you would see him in both Altgens and   
   Wiegman...Both you and Ford can't just ignore this and still pretend you are   
   credible...If Oswald was there you    
   would see him in both Altgens 6 and Wiegman...   
      
   That ignorant asshole James Gordon is punishing me for what they are guilty   
   of...The idiots on the Education Forum take Ford seriously and let him run   
   loose with his crazed trolling on their website...Ford is refuted by what I   
   wrote above...The Education    
   Forum members ignore it and allow the next Parker/Kamp nut loose on the   
   research community in order for persons like me to go through the hard work of   
   refuting...And then those idiots ignore the refutation...I get punished for   
   what Ford and the EF    
   members are guilty of...   
      
   As long as you are entertaining the agent provocateur troll Ford then you are   
   ignoring my evidence of Stanton hearing Oswald say he was going back in to the   
   2nd Floor Lunch Room...Alan Ford is the direct product of the stupidity of   
   moderators Knight,    
   Larsen, and Gordon - as well as the members...    
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)