From: 19efppp@mail.com   
      
   On Sunday, November 5, 2023 at 8:06:49 AM UTC-5, Brian Doyle wrote:   
   > On Sunday, November 5, 2023 at 3:36:52 AM UTC-5, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:    
   > > On Saturday, November 4, 2023 at 4:14:12 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:    
   > > > On Saturday, November 4, 2023 at 12:16:43 PM UTC-4, NoTrueFlags Here   
   wrote:    
   >    
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > > Don't be silly. Of course the shadow is an alteration. But Ford has the   
   wrong explanation for why it's there. You silly goose.   
   > The shadow is not an alteration...That's just you trolling...    
   >    
   > As I already explained, and you gave no answer to, Ford himself showed   
   Mytton's contrast enhancement of the Wiegman frame with the shadow and you   
   could see Lovelady's plaid right side appear in that enhancement...If you were   
   paying attention to what    
   Ford wrote he said that the shadow was impossible and was painted-in...If that   
   were true on a technical basis then Mytton would not have been able to bring   
   out any plaid right side in that image...The fact that Mytton could bring out   
   Lovelady's plaid    
   right side tells you, on a technical basis, that the image is real and is not   
   altered...That Lovelady's plaid right side is there and is hidden by   
   shadow...Therefore Ford refuted himself, but, being the crazy Duncan MacRae   
   troll that he is, he ignored it    
   and kept going anyway knowing that the dopes on the Education Forum would   
   never challenge him...    
   >    
   > Both you and Ford also ignored the fact that the first Wiegman frame shows   
   the exact scene in Altgens 6 from a 90 degree perspective...You can see in   
   that first Wiegman frame that the only two people not seen in Altgens are   
   Frazier and Prayer Man...If    
   Ford's imaginary, Cinque-like Oswald were out on the front step landing   
   platform like Ford is trolling you would see him in both Altgens and   
   Wiegman...Both you and Ford can't just ignore this and still pretend you are   
   credible...If Oswald was there you    
   would see him in both Altgens 6 and Wiegman...    
   >    
   > That ignorant asshole James Gordon is punishing me for what they are guilty   
   of...The idiots on the Education Forum take Ford seriously and let him run   
   loose with his crazed trolling on their website...Ford is refuted by what I   
   wrote above...The    
   Education Forum members ignore it and allow the next Parker/Kamp nut loose on   
   the research community in order for persons like me to go through the hard   
   work of refuting...And then those idiots ignore the refutation...I get   
   punished for what Ford and the    
   EF members are guilty of...    
   >    
   > As long as you are entertaining the agent provocateur troll Ford then you   
   are ignoring my evidence of Stanton hearing Oswald say he was going back in to   
   the 2nd Floor Lunch Room...Alan Ford is the direct product of the stupidity of   
   moderators Knight,    
   Larsen, and Gordon - as well as the members...   
   You're an idiot, but so what? You're a legend in your own mind!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)